The way that Romans 8. 13 happens to contradict the teachings of Paul on Salvation and justification is that it talks about the fact that people would have do die based on the way that live after he has taught the people earlier on eternal salvation.
<h3>Who was Paul?</h3>
He was one of the people that spread the gospel after Jesus Christ had ascended into heaven.
According to the passage in Romans 8. 13, he is trying to encourage the people to live a more Godly life. This is seen in his choice of wealth. According to him, when a person goes ahead to live a displeasing life, they would die, but when a person lives a more Christian life then they would have eternal life.
Read more on Paul here: brainly.com/question/16331056
#SPJ1
<span>-gifts
-books
-Japanese who traveled to China
</span>
Answer:
The stove, the loud hand-clap, fear.
Explanation:
According to the classical conditioning paradigm, the neutral stimulus in this scenario is the <em>stove</em>, the unconditioned stimulus is the <em>loud hand-clap</em>, and the unconditioned response is <em>fear</em>. Fear is an unconditioned response. It has been linked to the loud clapping of the hands that her mother made every time she got near the stove. Before the association, the stove was a neutral stimulus.
Most of the time... nothing.... but the senators had a purple stripe as well as different colored togas were worn for different things but most of the time a mans rank was determined by his wealth and his amount of slaves... Hope I helepd! brianliest? :D
