Answer: The answer is hindsight bias
Explanation:
Hindsight bias : This can be defined as a situation whereby a person forecast the consequence of an event that could happened in the future which eventually happened exactly the way the person had forecasted the event . When an event had occurred, people tend to have the habit of saying that,they knew the consequences of the event happening before it eventually happened. This concept is applicable in the areas of sport for example when someone forecast that his football team is going to beat their opponent by two goals to one and it eventually happened the way the person had predicted it. It can also be applicable in the areas of politics, for example when someone had forecasted that the candidate for their party in the forthcoming election will win the election by a wide margin to beat the other contestant in the election, and it happened exactly the person had predicted it. Therefore, in the event described in the question, the research is known as hindsight bias.
Answer: after kublais in 1294 it had begun to decline significantly in the mid 14th century
Explanation:
A. Commander in Cheif is the right one
<span>The
differing cultures that were embedded and mashed together could have
caused many disagreements based on the various views and rules in their
culture. The landscapes and nature surrounding Continental Europe which
included dense forests made travelling to faraway places hard. These are
only some of the condition that hindered the Roman Empire's expansion.</span>
The river provides them with drinking water fish and irrigation for farming
