Sylvia Mendez is an American civil rights activist who contributed to ending <u>school segregation</u>. Mendez is of Mexican-Puerto Rican heritage, and was not allowed to enrol in a "whites-only" school in California. At age eight, Sylvia and her family were involved in the case <em>Mendez v. Westminster</em> (1946). The case ended school segregation in California and contributed to the civil rights movement in other states. Sylvia Mendez was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the United States' highest civilian honor, on February 15, 2011.
Answer:
The Constitution of Bhutan (Dzongkha: འབྲུག་གི་རྩ་ཁྲིམས་ཆེན་མོ་; Wylie: 'Druk-gi cha-thrims-chen-mo) was enacted 18 July 2008 by the Royal Government of Bhutan. The Constitution was thoroughly planned by several government officers and agencies over a period of almost seven years amid increasing democratic reforms in Bhutan. The current Constitution is based on Buddhist philosophy, international Conventions on Human Rights, comparative analysis of 20 other modern constitutions, public opinion, and existing laws, authorities, and precedents.[1] According to Princess Sonam Wangchuck, the constitutional committee was particularly influenced by the Constitution of South Africa because of its strong protection of human rights.[2]
<em>I personally communicate my thoughts by saying how I feel to people around me with all honestly. </em>
<em>I am a very open and honest person. I always say how I see things and how I feel about a person, event or certain matters. But I have to be careful on the choice of words that I will say because not all people will be happy to hear my thoughts. I learned to be more sensitive with exercising my rights to be honest and open to others. I also approach people in the right time and venue to make them comfortable in awful situations and relax in embarrassing situations.</em>
A reason that the National Popular Vote, Inc. And others criticize the electoral vote system is D-Because they believe that elections should be determined by the popular vote.
The National Popular Vote, Inc wants to do away with the indirect method of voting through the Electoral College. The reason for this is that the College system may end up causing that eventually, the winner of the election is the candidate who lost the popular vote. As it was the case in the 2000 and 2016 elections.
