1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GREYUIT [131]
3 years ago
5

What is a square a parallelogram but a parallelogram not a square a square

Mathematics
2 answers:
Savatey [412]3 years ago
5 0
Square is 90 degrees but parallelogram is not
Alinara [238K]3 years ago
3 0
A square has both parallel sides
being the top and bottom
but also both the sides 

AND so does a PARALLELogram
BUT a square has ALL right (90 d) angles 
and a parallelogram does NOT 

ALSO . . . . . SUMMARY . . . . .  
The sides of a square are parallel
and all the angles equal 360 degrees,
so it's a parallelogram. BUT a
parallelogram is NOT a square
because a squares angles need to be 90 degrees.

does that answer your question?
You might be interested in
Explain how the sum will be greater than 5 <br> 3 3/4 + 1 1/2=
aivan3 [116]
This is because 3 3/4 (3.75) + 1 1/2 (1.50) is 5.25. So first you can find the common denominator for 3/4 and 1/2. The xommon denominator is 4 since 3/4 already have a common denominator of 4 you leave 3 34 alone. For 1/2 multiply the nuerator and denominator by 2 resulting in 2/4 so together its 1 2/4. When you add 3 3/4+ 1 2/4, you will get 5 1/4 or 5.25. The easier way is just converting the fractions to decimal. Therefore the answer is 5.25. 5.25> 5
8 0
3 years ago
What is the least common denominator of 5/8, 1/8, and 1/2
Pepsi [2]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
-2x+6y=6 -7x+8y=-5 by substitution
Goryan [66]

Answer:

69

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Round 6.677 to the nearest tenth,
Anon25 [30]

Answer:

6.8

.................

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
*BRIANLIEST WILL BE GIVEN*(08.06 LC)
Ganezh [65]
Adding the equations to eliminate p would be the correct step because when you add the equations together, the variable p would cancel out and be eliminated leaving you with 2w=35 you can then solve for the value of w which you can then input to find the value of p, allowing you to solve for the values of both p and w.
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write the equation of the line that is perpendicular to y = 4 x − 8 y=4x-8 and passes through the point ( 4 , 3 ) (4,3)
    8·1 answer
  • The federal government would like to estimate the proportion of households in the U.S. population that own their own homes. A pi
    6·1 answer
  • X=1/4w(y+t) solve for y
    14·1 answer
  • -2x + y = 0 <br><br> -7x + 3y = 2<br> ​
    14·2 answers
  • DUE TONIGHT. Im really confused please help me with what you can and show work. I will mark Brainly!!
    6·1 answer
  • Do not falsely report this please
    15·2 answers
  • A room with an area of 20 1/4 square meters is being divided into 3 sections of equal area. What will the area of each section b
    9·1 answer
  • Please help me solve problem 2 and 3
    8·1 answer
  • Solve each equation. Show all of your work and check your answer<br><br> 4x=1/3(6x-30)-2
    12·1 answer
  • How do I solve problems like this? <br><br> X + 1/2 = 4/6
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!