Answer:
Option B is not a justification
Step-by-step explanation:
Option A is a justification (to get two pair of similar triangles (ABC-ACD) and (ABC-BCD))
Option C is a justification (a^2 = cy, b^2 = cx, a^2 + b^2 = cy + cx)
Option D is a justification (a^2 + b^2 = cy + cx = c(y + x) = c^2)
=> Option B is not a justification
Answer:
60cm
Step-by-step explanation:
200*3/10=20*3=60
A) See picture for the table.
To make the table, multiply 47774 by 1.5% to get total that have diabetes and multiply 5855 by 2.5% to get total unemployed that have it, then using subtraction fill in the other squares of the table.
B)
Hypothesis:
H0: No association between employment and diabetes.
H1: Association between the two
Using a graphing calculator or Excel, run a chi-test.
Chi squared equals 31.844 with 1 degrees of freedom.
The two-tailed P value is less than 0.0001
With this information we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude there is an association between diabetes and employment.
C)
Although there is a statistical significance, there really is no practical significance between an incidence rate of 1.5 or 2.5%
Answer:
First, make the double negative a positive.
So, (-6/13) + (7/15)
Then multiply the numerator, 6×7=42
And denominator 13×15=195
42/195 simplify by dividing both by 3 so 14/65
❤ <em>Hey There!! ❤</em>
<em>The answer is below!!</em>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Step-by-step explanation:
x
÷
x
= $
$1,131.20
<em>P.S </em><em>Tell me if this is wrong...</em>

#

#
