Answer:
Answer: 67.97%
Step-by-step explanation: BEWARE: THE ANSWER IS NOT 39.56%.
Answer:
$0 < p ≤ $25
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that coach Rivas can spend up to $750 on 30 swimsuits.
This means that the maximum cost that the coach can afford to pay is $750, then if the cost for the 30 swimsuits is C, we have the inequality:
C ≤ $750
Now, if each swimsuit costs p, then 30 of them costs 30 times p, then the cost of the swimsuits is:
C = 30*p
Then we have the inequality:
30*p ≤ $750.
To find the possible values of p, we just need to isolate p in one side of the inequality.
So we can divide both sides by 30 to get:
(30*p)/30 ≤ $750/30
p ≤ $25
And we also should add the restriction:
$0 < p ≤ $25
Because a swimsuit can not cost 0 dollars or less than that.
Then the inequality that represents the possible values of p is:
$0 < p ≤ $25
ANSWER:
Both functions have the same slope
The linear equation does not have a y-intercept
The table and the grahp express an equivalent function
STEP-BY-STEP EXPLANATION:
In order to compare, we must calculate the slope of the table, knowing that the equation in its slope and intercept form is the following:

The formula to calculate the slope is the following:

The points are (-6, -9/2) and (4,3), replacing:

The slope is 3/4
Now, for b
x = 4
y = 3
m = 3/4
replacing:

The equation is:

Therefore, the true statements are:
• Both functions have the same slope
,
• The linear equation does not have a y-intercept
,
• The table and the grahp express an equivalent function
7(2)+7(5) {using distributive property}
14+35 {7 multiplied by 2 gives 14 and 7 multiplied by 5 gives 35}
49 {therefore 35+14 gives 49}