Answer:
This is a philosophical approach, it must be taken into account that in ethical theory there is a large number of moral coincidences, such as: it is wrong to steal and its universality, in ethical theories. But there are also many differences between ethical theories, one very important and which divides them into two types, are the Materialist ethical theories and those that are not. Materialistic ethical theories are those that in general tell us what we must do to achieve good and to be good, that is, they are content ethics pursues a series of ethical norms about what we must do, they condition the rules or norms to persecuted objects.
In the ethical theories indicated there are differences, those of materialistic tendencies: first: the tendency of divine command very similar to the naturalistic theory of Saint Thomas, which defends the good with the approach to a supreme God and follows the law of divine origin . Second: DJMill's utilitarianism good is the pleasure or absence of pain and is achieved through pleasure actions. Now it is pointed out that Kantism (non-materialist) corresponds to being a formal ethic whose author was Kant, defends good with the only morally good, a good intention and seeks to achieve good in the imperative, categorical, acts in a way that he can wish without contradiction , points out that the maxim is taken as a universal law. Kantina's law is called formal and comes before material ethics.
Coca cola affects the human body very badly by adding all those sugars in your system.
the people views of the united states think that its healthy as the manufacturing company itself promotes it as its the number one zero calories drink going around , but doctors are trying to warn people to save them from dieases
Answer:
Accommodation
Explanation:
Accommodation: The term accommodation is given by one of the famous psychologist Jean Piaget. He described the process that occurs when new experience or information causes a person to modify his or her existing schemas. Instead of making the new experience or information fit into an existing or already present schema, the person changes the schema to accommodate the new experience or information.
Example:
For a girl, a horse is a four-legged animal, huge, and having a long tail. The first time when she sees a cow, the girl calls it a horse because that fits in with the girl's current schema.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
