1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sati [7]
2 years ago
9

What happens when cultures collide? Good and bad please.

History
2 answers:
notka56 [123]2 years ago
7 0

In When Cultures Collide, Richard D. Lewis provides a truly global and practical guide to working and communicating across cultures, explaining how our own culture and language affect the ways in which we organize our world, think, feel and respond, before going on to suggest both general and specific ways of making our influence felt across the cultural divide.

There are penetrating insights into how different business cultures accord status, structure their organizations and view the role of the leader, alongside invaluable advice on global negotiation, sales and marketing. The book ranges from differences in etiquette and body language to new thinking in the area of international management and team-building in Europe and the USA, as well as covering challenging new geographical ground in Russia, China and the Far East.  By focusing on the cultural roots of national behavior, both in society and business, we can foresee and calculate with a surprising degree of accuracy how others will react and respond to us. Lewis adds the often overlooked dimension of language – for example, how Japanese often react in a certain way because they are thinking in Japanese.

When Cultures Collide gives you a greater understanding of what makes other people tick and enables managers to ensure that their policies and activities exploit cultural synergies and make the right appeal to their chosen market.

Elenna [48]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:When organizations merge, two cultures are thrown together, and that could result in a collision that will eventually destroy the new company. On paper, many mergers make good business sense.

Explanation:

So basically, good.

You might be interested in
The Embargo Act of 1807: was Jefferson's attempt to keep the country at peace and avoid further provocative incidents stopped th
lana66690 [7]
The Embargo Act of 1807 was Jefferson's attempt to keep the country at peace and avoid further provocative incidents. It also stopped the export of American goods <span>and prohibited all U.S. ships from leaving for foreign ports. And it was denounced by New England merchants and western and southern farmers alike, therefore all of the above is the correct answer!</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Briefly explain ONE important difference between the economic systems of the North and the South in the period 1790–1840.
alexdok [17]

Answer: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

7 0
3 years ago
Hellllp asappp. What was John Locke take on federalism? Helpppp
Zolol [24]
John Locke (29 August 1632 – 28 October 1704) was an influential English philosopher and social contract theorist. He developed an alternative to the Hobbesian state of nature and asserted a government could be good only if it received the consent of the governed and protected the natural rights of life, liberty, and estate. If such a consent was not achieved, Locke argued in favour of a right of rebellion, which he referred to as an "appeal to heaven
4 0
3 years ago
How did the reform movements of the 1840s change america society?
IceJOKER [234]

Answer:These reform movements sought to promote basic changes in American society, including the abolition of slavery, education reform, prison reform, women's rights, and temperance (opposition to alcohol).

Explanation:

If this isn't right, pls tell me so I can fix it.;)

4 0
2 years ago
Explain the 2 pros and 2 cons of having only three requirements to be president of the United States
LekaFEV [45]
The requirements of a candidate who’s goal is to become president is:

•be a natural-born citizen of the United States
•be at least 35 years of age
•be a resident of the United States for at least 14 years

The pros of this are that the age requirement was set in to place because the Founding Fathers believe that a middle aged person has fully developed and matured. And that’s true (but not all the time). The requirements also do not eliminate any person of any race or religion or sexual preference from becoming president. Any one can become president!
The cons of this are that it kind of excludes immigrants who dream as serving as president as this requirement was put into place so as not to be influenced by foreign administration.
I only have two pros and one con, sorry...
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The primary reason European languages are spoken in Africa is yhat
    6·1 answer
  • A US senator in the early 1900s believes that the US must build more
    14·1 answer
  • How long did the battle of Naseby last?
    14·2 answers
  • _____parenting is a belief, or a way of living, that teaches and emphasizes good behavior in the process of raising children.
    15·1 answer
  • why did the United States try to limit north vietnams power after it won its independence from France?
    8·1 answer
  • Why was President Clinton impeached in 1998?
    10·1 answer
  • Write an essay in which you explain how the ancient Roman Republic, British traditions, the American colonial experience, and th
    6·1 answer
  • Some extra point for you guys!
    7·2 answers
  • What was president Lincoln's Pan for reconstruction?
    5·1 answer
  • WHAT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AMERICAN AND ANCIENT GREEK DEMOCRACY DOES THIS PASSAGE DEMONSTRATE
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!