ABSURD dramatic movement featured unconventional dramatic elements, often lacking order and purpose.
Answer: the correct answer is he pointed out that freedom has its price.
Explanation: the author says: "...that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly..." meaning that fighting for freedom won't be easy and it will have its prize.
Answer:
Sava is a very good student. She always abides<u><em> (a)by</em></u> the rules and regulation of school. She takes care <u><em>(b)of </em></u>her health too. She knows that morning walk is very beneficial <em><u>(c)for</u></em> health. She never complains <u><em>(d)to/ about</em></u> anyone. If she makes any mistake she apologies <em><u>(e)for</u></em> it. She tries her best to abstain herself <em><u>(f)from</u></em> doing wrong. She works hard and is confident <em><u>(g)of</u></em> her good result in the upcoming examination. She finally believes <u><em>(h)in</em></u> God.
Explanation:
In the given 'fill in the blanks' question, the best way to fill the blanks and make correct sentences will be to use prepositions.
Now, prepositions are words that tell us the position, the relation of the words to each other. In short, they indicate the relation of the words in the sentence.
Therefore, the given passage with the correct prepositions will be-
<em>Sava is a very good student. She always abides </em><u><em>by</em></u><em> the rules and regulation of school. She takes care </em><u><em>of</em></u><em> her health too. She knows that morning walk is very beneficial </em><u><em>for</em></u><em> health. She never complains </em><u><em>to/ about</em></u><em> anyone. If she makes any mistake she apologies </em><u><em>for</em></u><em> it. She tries her best to abstain herself </em><u><em>from</em></u><em> doing wrong. She works hard and is confident </em><u><em>of</em></u><em> her good result in the upcoming examination. She finally believes </em><u><em>in</em></u><em> God.
</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
We have always had stories. They were first told orally as fairy tales, folklore, and epic poems, and were eventually written down. And for as long as we have had stories, we’ve had literature. Stories are usually considered literature when they have long-lasting artistic or social value. Epic poems like The Odyssey or novels like To Kill a Mockingbird are considered literature because they have deeper meanings that go beyond the story. Both stories are meant to do more than just amuse the reader. A pop novel, like a James Patterson book you can buy at the airport, would not traditionally be considered literature because it is not meant to do much more than entertain the reader.
As we’ve transitioned from hearing stories to reading them, our ideas have changed about what kinds of stories have merit. We have always made a point to pass on the stories we value to next generation, regardless of their form. Therefore, it should not be so outrageous to declare that a new form of literature has been forged and needs to be passed on: television shows.
Television shows can be as complex as novels and can provide students with opportunities to learn that novels do not. Yet, there are legitimate concerns about using classroom time to dissect1 television. One issue is that complex television shows tend to have adult or graphic themes not suitable for the classroom. Another concern involves how much time students spend on television. Plenty of students already watch and discuss television in their own time, so is television needed in the classroom, too? Finally, the written word teaches cognitive2 skills that television cannot.
Answer:
Some contend that Whites’ application of values to form opinions about race-conscious policy may constitute a subtle form of racism. Others challenge the new racism thesis, suggesting that racism and values are exclusive in their influence. Proponents of the thesis assert that many Whites’ attitudes about such policy are structured by a mix of racism and American individualism. The author suggests that an even more subtle form of racism may exist. Racism may actually be expressed in opposition to big government. The test results presented here indicate that the effects of limited-government values on attitudes about race-conscious policy are conditional on levels of racial prejudice for many Whites, whereas the effects on racially ambiguous social welfare policy attitudes are not. The author contends that these results provide support to the argument that racism still exists and has found a new subtle expression.