Answer:
The answer is interactionist perspective.
Explanation:
As the name suggests, this approach studies the interaction of people within a society, and focuses on how these interactions shape their environment.
Interactionists may use different methods, such as interviews and observational participation, for collecting data. It's also possible to use secondary sources.
It should be mentioned that the Bloc party strives to establish the circumstances for Quebec's political separation from Canada and campaigns solely inside the province during federal elections. The party has been labeled as separatist and social democratic (or "sovereigntist").
<h3>How does Canada conduct Federal Elections?</h3>
Candidates and political parties are the most prominent participants in elections, but they are not the only ones. Behind the scenes, election workers are critical to ensuring that each electoral event is fair and well-managed.
On election day, a tiny army of poll workers staffs tens of thousands of permanent and mobile polling places around the country. Workers are also needed in advance polling places and at municipal Elections Canada offices (the latter of which are open for the full election period).
The operations of these employees are coordinated by a returned candidate in each of the 338 voting districts. Field liaison officers are also employed to help returning police with their responsibilities.
Learn more about Bloc Party of Canada:
brainly.com/question/19295746
#SPJ1
Answer:
Expanded.
Explanation:
As the exercise briefly explains, to expand a text is to move the characters further apart but not changed in size or shape. To expand and to condense a text is similar; first: select the text you wish to expand or condense. Then, click the Dialog Box launcher in the Home tab and go to the advanced tab. From there, go to the font Dialog Box launcher and, in the spacing box, select click expanded or condensed and specify how much space you want.
That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
