Answer:B) An internal locus of control
Explanation:
As people we go through different situations and challenges but we differ in how we handle these situations and challenges. There are people who are able to hold on to a belief that everything is in our hands and we are in control of what happens in our life are referred to by psychologist as having internal locus of control.
Those who feel out of control , like things that happens to their life are beyond their control and they usually blame it on external factors , they have external locus of control.
Our locus of control can help us handle situations better and give us that power to influence things in our lives and not just give up. People will take charge of their lives if they feel they are in control just like Jessica does.
Answer:
D. participated in a winner-take-all competition
Explanation:
Robbers Cave Study can be characterized as a study of realistic group conflict. This study aimed to analyze and explain how hostility grows between groups through conflicts created in competitions. Furthermore, this study explained how feelings of prejudice and discrimination arise among groups that were competing for something. In the Robbers Cave study, specifically, this conflict between the groups developed into a competition where the winner took all the prizes.
I think the answer is mayors court
The speech was for teacher's day
Answer:
D. History of man
Explanation:
The fifteenth century Italian humanists used the term Studia humanitatis to denote the scholarly and secular literary activities which that they thought to be essentially classical and humane studies. Rhetoric, poetry, moral philosophy, ancient Latin and Greek studies were known as Studia humanitatis.
the revival of the study of the classical antiquity in Italy and western Europe in the 14th, 15th and 16th century was known as Renaissance humanism. It started in Italy and later spread to western Europe.
Humanism is contemporary to that period that emphasised the agency and value of human beings. It prefers evidence and critical thinking over acceptance of dogma or superstition.
