#1) write an essay where you analyze the tone the character Marullus uses to express his interpretation of Caesar's return.
Answer: His tone is that of someone that is worried or even alarmed at Caesar’s return after he defeated his rival and also former co-ruler Pompey. Marullus knew that this victory would mean that Caesar will be the most powerful man in Rome. For this same reason he felt in a very dangerous position. He assumed that Caesar would soon impose one-man rule. Marullus joins Flavius who feels the same way to try and put a stop to Caesar.
#2) How this is similar or different from the interpretation the painter has depicted?
Answer: It is clear that the interpretation the painter has depicted is very different. This is apparent when you compare the painting to the word that Marullus himself used to describe the return of Caesar. In the painting it seems as though Marullus is impressed by Caesar’s feat. I believe he was just putting up a front while deep down he felt disgusted just looking at caesar in his glory moment.
Using the formula:
Which is, 3.14 x 2^2 (radius is half of diameter)
Which equals 12.56.
People, events, and ideas all impact one another in a literary text. The same may be said for an informational text. All of the pieces work together to support and explain the text's principal point.
Analyzing the many links and interactions between people, events, and ideas can help readers better grasp what they read.
This enables readers to draw crucial inferences about a book, such as how a particular incident impacts an individual or how one person's concept might influence others.
<h3>What is a textual interaction?</h3>
This is simply defined as the way things affect one another.
<h3>What is a transition?</h3>
When a word or a phrase connects one idea to another it is called a transition word or phrase. Transitions are crucial when analyzing text interaction because, they are the "door" that lead from one idea into another.
Learn more about interactions between ideas and individuals in a text:
brainly.com/question/24353040
#SPJ1
I would choose a. Simply because the author talks about it as if it's all that really ever existed and that nature cannot take over what it is not. However, it goes on about seeing how erosion and rot can affect such things and tries to compare it to things in nature as if it were nature itself.
