Based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
This is because, before the agreed date of 20th August, X withdrew her acceptance and sent it by post and also made a call to Y which informed him of her current stance.
<h3>What is a Contract?</h3>
This refers to the legally binding agreement that exists between two or more people about the terms of something.
Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
Notwithstanding the arrival of the postal letter of acceptance, this is considered void as there has been a change of terms that have been clearly communicated to the other party.
Read more about contract here:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
Stare decisis maybe? sorry if wrong
Answer:
I think her income would be low due to her son being 17 & not a child anymore so what I'm trying to say is, the less her child is the more money she gets. The older her child gets, the less she will have.
Explanation:
1). arch 70% of time
2) loops 60% of time
3). whirls rare, less than 40% of time
Answer:
Option B)
As per me I would say it’s both at federal and state level
