The database system allows the creation of a single depository of information, which is updated periodically and which can be used simultaneously by many users, since this type of system allows the effective sharing of all data stored in its depository . In addition, this is a secure system and is very difficult to break into. This is because of the efficiency of the software used to maintain it. However, the use of these softwares can be a little complicated for users, in addition to requiring a high economic cost to obtain them.
The traditional file system, in turn, each user must obtain their own file related to the application they want to run. This may seem dull in comparison to the database, but it is advantageous as it does not require any spending on software, as it is simple and there are several cheap and efficient tools and editors on the market. However, this system is not so safe, it can cause isolation of data and even data inconsistency, which disrupts the entire system.
Every application has access to specific opened port. If you only make a exception for the specific application only that application can bypass the firewall.
Answer:
=IF(D3>50; E3; F3) AND =IF(A1>60;"Pass";"Fail")
Explanation:
An IF structure is built following this pattern:
IF(TEST;IFTRUE;IFFALSE)
These are the only options in the given drop-down menus what comply with this pattern. All others are not following this pattern.
The computer will do the test and if the result is true will apply the IFTRUE value, otherwise will apply the IFFALSE value.
The answer is a) It improves upon the two-phased commit by requiring that locks be acquired at the start of a transaction.
Reason: The 3PC is an extension or you can say developed from 2PC that avoids blocking of an operation. It just ensures that first n sites have intended to commit a transaction that means it acquires commits or locks before the start of any transaction to avoid any blocking.
Option b) is wrong as it does not allow coordination, it just let all the other sites do their transaction if any other site is blocked, so no coordination is there between sites that they will wait till their coordinator is corrected.
Option c) is wrong as lock operations are shared between other connections as when their coordinator fails, the new coordinator agrees to the old coordinator that they had shared locks before and they can start their transaction.
Option d) is wrong as option a) is correct.
If you like the answer, please upvote.
