Answer: Tina doesn't have a standing
Explanation:
From the information given in the question, we are told that Consumer Goods Corporation sells products that are poorly made.
We are further told that Tina, who has never bought a product from Consumer Goods, files a suit against the firm alleging that its products are defective.
The firm could ask for dismissal of the suit on the basis that Tina doesn't have a standing. This is because Tina has never bought their goods before and therefore shouldn't be alleging that the product of the company is bad. Assuming Tina has bought their products before, then it'll have been harder for the firm to ask for dismissal.
Answer: Gross pay- $1750.00
Net pay - $1,215.75
Explanation: Gross pay = Nomal time =$28*40= $1,120. Overtime = $28*1.5*15= $630 Total= $1,750
Net pay = $1,750 less Security tax, Medicare tax, federal income tax withheld.
$1750* 6.0%= $105
$1750* 1.5% = $26.25
Tax withheld= $403
Net pay= $1,750-$105-$26.25-$403
= $1,215.75
Answer:
If the effective tax rate increases then the net savings coming from investments will get lowered as a result the investment will have higher payback period (The increase in effective tax rate would lower demand of the product which means there is decline in net saving arising from the sale of the product). Likewise this decrease in annual net savings will also decrease the internal rate of return which shows that their are increased chances of project rejections. The NPV method is based on cash flows and relevant costing just like IRR and payback method but the only difference is that it assumes that the cash earned would be reinvested at cost of capital. The NPV will also decrease due to increased effective tax rate.
Answer:
ɴᴏ ᴘɪᴄ sᴏʀʀʏ :(( ʙʏᴇ :)))
