Price Ceiling
Sellers are prohibited by law from charging a higher price to buyers covered under the ceiling
Answer: $120000
Explanation:
Share of voice refers to the measure of the exposure that a particular business gets when it's being compared to other competitors. The share of market is the percentage of a market that a company earns.
From the information given, since 60% of the market sales equate to $240000 spent a year, then in order to achieve a market share of 30%, ½ of $240000 will be spent which is $120000. Therefore, Great Catch should be prepared to spend at least $120000 if it hopes to achieve a market share of 30 percent.
Answer: If the material is reworked and sold, Hodge Inc. has a financial disadvantage of (- 4500).
Let's see why:
1) If we sell the material at its disposal value: We have a cost of $ 74600 and the income from sale would be $ 57400 =
57400 - 74600 = (-17200). We have a loss of $17200.
2) If we rework the material we will have an original cost of $ 74600, an additional cost for reworking of $ 1500 and the income from its sale would be $ 54400 =
54400 - (74600 + 1500) = (-21700) We have a loss of $ 21700.
Then comparing the 2 situations =
(-21700) - (-17200) = -4500. There is a financial disadvantage of $4,500 if the material is reworked instead of selling it as scrap.
It should be noted that basic objective of a CPA firm is to provide professional services, and this is done by system of quality control.
With the establishment of quality control policies as well as procedure, reasonable assurance can be provided.
<h3>What are objective of a CPA firm?</h3>
The objective of a CPA firm is to be in control of the system and regulate the system activities.
objective of a CPA firm at;
brainly.com/question/14175988
Answer:
True
Explanation:
There are several Supreme Court Rulings regarding the ADEA during the past two decades, most of them concerning technical issues, but the most straightforward ruling regarding the question is:
General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline, 540 U.S. 581 (2004)
The Supreme Court ruled that the purpose of the ADEA is to prevent discrimination against older workers in benefit of younger workers, but it does not prevent discrimination against younger workers in benefit of older workers.
