India is suddenly in the news for all the wrong reasons. It is now hitting the headlines as one of the most unequal countries in the world, whether one measures inequality on the basis of income or wealth.
So how unequal is India? As the economist Branko Milanovic says: “The question is simple, the answer is not.” Based on the new India Human Development Survey (IHDS), which provides data on income inequality for the first time, India scores a level of income equality lower than Russia, the United States, China and Brazil, and more egalitarian than only South Africa.
According to a report by the Johannesburg-based company New World Wealth, India is the second-most unequal country globally, with millionaires controlling 54% of its wealth. With a total individual wealth of $5,600 billion, it’s among the 10 richest countries in the world – and yet the average Indian is relatively poor.
Compare this with Japan, the most equal country in the world, where according to the report millionaires control only 22% of total wealth.
In India, the richest 1% own 53% of the country’s wealth, according to the latest data from Credit Suisse. The richest 5% own 68.6%, while the top 10% have 76.3%. At the other end of the pyramid, the poorer half jostles for a mere 4.1% of national wealth.
What’s more, things are getting better for the rich. The Credit Suisse data shows that India’s richest 1% owned just 36.8% of the country’s wealth in 2000, while the share of the top 10% was 65.9%. Since then they have steadily increased their share of the pie. The share of the top 1% now exceeds 50%.
This is far ahead of the United States, where the richest 1% own 37.3% of total wealth. But India’s finest still have a long way to go before they match Russia, where the top 1% own a stupendous 70.3% of the country’s wealth.
Id say a.a judgment of the value of the self
i say this becuase its the closest thing that resembles the deffinitions of self-esteem which means "<span>confidence in one's own worth or abilities; self-respect."
low self-esteem is when you DON'T respect yourself and have a lack of self confidence
therefore ur answer is a :)</span>
A developer of commercial property is required to provide off-street parking for tenants. This is an example of police power. Thus the correct answer is C.
<h3>What is commercial property?</h3>
The property which is used for commercial purposes not for residential living is referred to as commercial property. This involves the building of shopping malls, business complexes, theatres, hospitals, and so on.
Developers of commercial real estate are required to offer tenants off-street parking. In order to preserve coordination, the facilities must be maintained in accordance with the constitution, which is an illustration of police power.
Therefore, option C police power is appropriate.
Learn more about police power, here:
brainly.com/question/2863065
#SPJ4
