Answer:
there wouldn't be a society because there would be no offspring
Explanation:
Answer: Moving forward, if the aggregate-goal score after two legs is tied, there will be two 15-minute periods of extra time. And if no further goals are scored during extra time, a penalty-kick shootout will take place to determine which team advances
Explanation: hope this helps :D
Answer:
b. social distinctions were more blurred than in europe.
Explanation:
<u>British taxes practically caused the revolution of the colonies</u>, therefore option "A" is not the correct answer.
That various religious and ethnic groups coexisted in the American colonies was no reason for colonists to tend to support British royalty (D).<em> In fact, diversity and immigration were one of the reasons why the thirteen colonies flourished so quickly.</em>
The colonists didn´t feel that British royalty did anything for them as they had to survive on their own, dedicating themselves mainly to agriculture. <u>The difference in wealth between the inhabitants of England and the colonists was very large, therefore the colonists did not feel entitled to the rights of English citizens (C). Not because the American colonies had a great diversity of religious and ethnic groups.</u>
Because the American colonies were home to diverse religious and ethnic groups, social distinctions were more blurred than in Europe (B). In New England, diversity was ironically the point in common that its inhabitants had and that would lead them to fight for their independence.
Answer:
We have to answer if the response choices to this question are:
a) Open-ended
b) Scale
c) Contingent
d) Fixed
And the correct answer is:
b) Scale
Explanation:
The response choices are of scale-type because they represent a gradient (or a scale).
They are meant to express the level of unsafety that the elderly experience in their neighborhood, and go, from the highest point the scale (a great deal), to the lowest point in the scale (none), with two options in the middle acting acting as a bridge between the two extremes (Some, Not too much).
Answer:a.Naturalist
Explanation:
A naturalist believes that subjects or participants are able to show their original behavior if they are in their natural environment. A researcher would be more likely to get a true presentation of the participants behaviour if they observe them in their natural environment, if they are not aware that they are under observation. People act normal in normal situations but may alter their behaviour in situations when they know they are being watched.
A naturalist will carry those experiments or research that can't not be done in a lab such as this one of observing women in a shelter.
