1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ohaa [14]
3 years ago
9

How long does it take to become a orthopedic surgeon?

Social Studies
1 answer:
adelina 88 [10]3 years ago
6 0
You must complete a 4 year degree in biology , anatomy/phy , pre-medicine etc . Then you must have 4 years in medical school . After that you must complete a 4-5 year surgical internship/residency at the hospital. So in total its 12+ years to be at the top. but during your 4-5 year surgical residency you will be able to scub in / assist on surgery.
You might be interested in
A government is made up of the1. corporate structure of a nation. 2. military-industrial establishment. 3. formal institutions t
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

3. formal institutions that rule a people.

7 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of s
Alex Ar [27]

Answer:

<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>

Explanation:

Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the  position of an individual.  They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.

The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.

While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.

In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.

6 0
3 years ago
What was the book that blamed Jews for Germany’s troubles ?
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

5

During World War I, almost 100,000 German Jews proudly served in military uniform as soldiers, sailors, airmen and administrators. But far from a better public opinion of Germany’s Jewish citizens, after Germany’s crushing loss there was instead a subsequent rise in anti-Semitic narratives.

Among the common myths circulated at the time were assertions — based on real-life examples — that Jews were war profiteering at home. On top of that, it was rumored that Jews were “war shirking” — a term used to describe avoiding military responsibilities at the front lines.

The potent mix of prejudices and stereotypes quickly led a battered post-WWI German people to pin all their troubles on a ready-made scapegoat: the Jews.

Get The Times of Israel's Daily Edition by email and never miss our top storiesFREE SIGN UP

“If we want to clearly understand how the Nazis came to power, we need to see it was the events of WWI that were fundamental to their rise,” says British historian Tim Grady, whose latest book is “A Deadly Legacy: German Jews and the Great War.”

Tim Grady, author of ‘A Deadly Legacy: German Jews and the Great War.’ (Courtesy)

“The legacies that come out of WWI — such as total war and a culture of destruction — are extremely important,” says Grady. “These remain after 1919, into the Weimar Republic, which never really becomes a proper postwar society. And so the Nazis build and develop out of this defeat and legacy.”

Therefore, while the wartime experience of German Jews “was almost the same as other Germans,” says Grady, the instability and chaos that resulted from some prominent Jews’ legacies were eventually exploited by the National Socialists as the party made its bid for power.

Through the figure of Adolf Hitler, the Nazi party became what Grady calls “the personification of WWI.”

“They are the party that will avenge Germany’s defeat,” says Grady, “and part of their legacy of WWI involves targeting Jews.”

Adolf Hitler, far right, with his war comrades of the Bavarian Reserve Infantry 16th Regiment, in 1914. (Bundesarchiv bild)

WWI, when Jews were leaders in German society

Grady believes there is an understandable inclination to approach the history of Jewish life in Germany from the perspective of what he calls a “vanishing point” — whether it’s 1933, 1938 or 1941. However, the historian says it’s important to trace the WWI culture that Jews, as well as other Germans, helped to define.

One crucial step toward scapegoating the Jews is the “stab in the back” myth, which originated in 1917 in the wake of German parliament’s peace resolution that sought to quickly end WWI. Major-General Hans von Seeckt complained that the “home [front] has stabbed [Germany] in the back.”

“For the Nazis, the ‘stab-in-the-back theory’ is the crucial legacy of WWI,” says Grady.

The myth really began to gain momentum, however, when Paul von Hindenburg and Erich Ludendorff testified to the National Assembly in the new Weimar Republic in 1919.

“They suggest that someone has stabbed Germany in the back,” the historian explains. “And while they don’t identify anybody in particular, they certainly hint that some Jews could have been responsible for this.”

General Paul von Hindenburg, Kaiser Wilhelm II, and General Erich Ludendorff in German headquarters, January 1917. (Public domain)

This mythology gained even more traction in the Weimar Republic throughout the 1920s. Grady’s book recalls how in April 1924 an infamous image appeared on the cover of the front page of a German magazine called Süddeutsche Monatshefte, which had a Jewish editor, Paul Nikolaus Cossmann.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Identify the steps in the rain shadow process
Semmy [17]

<span>A rain shadow is a dry region of land on the side that is protected against the prevailing winds of a mountain range. The prevailing winds are the winds that occur most of the time in a particular place of the Earth</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is true?
Westkost [7]

Answer:

D) Attitudes predict behavior under certain conditions.                                            

Explanation:

Attitude: In psychology, the term attitude refers to a combination of behaviors, beliefs, and emotions towards a specific person, thing, event, or object. It is said that the attitude of a person depends on upbringing or experience and it can have a powerful influence on the behavior of the person.

According to the ABC model, an attitude consists of three components:

1. A-affective.

2. B-behavioral.

3. C-cognitive.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does the sense of belonging help to develop a good society? Write your opinion​
    15·1 answer
  • The colonists took several actions to oppose the Intolerable Acts. Which two actions do you agree with the most and why?
    11·1 answer
  • How does wire services affect stories we read in the newspaper?
    14·1 answer
  • Harold dreams that he is on a train traveling through mountains in what he thinks is switzerland. he can see the train very clea
    11·1 answer
  • Mrs. Brown is in the office for a blood pressure check, and you notice that she is limping. She says, "Everything is fine, I jus
    10·2 answers
  • In 1793, Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin. How did this invention influence the price of cotton? A. It caused prices to incre
    15·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from The Call of the Wild below and answer the question.
    7·2 answers
  • Two reasons for conflict​
    10·2 answers
  • An actor who approaches a role through the study of human behavior in its outward forms is using an:
    14·1 answer
  • What are some important elements of working with vendors as a sysadmin?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!