The evidence for the claim that campaign money buys influence and elected officials ignore voters to please donors is tenuous.
<h3>What is a tenuous claim?</h3>
This is the type of claim that people make that cannot be said to be strong, definite of have been made sure of. People just make these types of claims based on the things that they think even though it may not exactly be true.
The claim that campaign money buys influence is tenuous based on the fact that the claim has not being tested to be true. It was just made by the people without any concrete information that would serve as pointers for the reason for such a speech.
Read more on claim here: brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
Answer:Notice that members of the House are elected every two years, whereas senators are elected for six-year terms. ... House members must be twenty-five years of age and citizens for seven years. Senators are at least thirty years old and citizens for nine years. Another difference is who they represent.
Explanation:
more POWER
Answer:
u can be a big brain
u will get good income
u will be happier---marshmelloww
Explanation:
The correct answer is letter D. To provide equal access to water sources. Nucleated settlements are designed to be like this to enable people to have easy access not only on water but also in other forms of produce like agriculture and domestication. This gives people the equal opportunity to maximize what available resources are within their location.
I think the answer is B because why would anyone care if he made money or not. Also i think it because the others don't seem right. Hope i'm not to late.
