Explanation:
Trade was also a boon for human interaction, bringing cross-cultural contact to a whole new level. When people first settled down into larger towns in Mesopotamia and Egypt, self-sufficiency – the idea that you had to produce absolutely everything that you wanted or needed – started to fade. A farmer could now trade grain for meat, or milk for a pot, at the local market, which was seldom too far away. Cities started to work the same way, realizing that they could acquire goods they didn't have at hand from other cities far away, where the climate and natural resources produced different things. This longer-distance trade was slow and often dangerous but was lucrative for the middlemen willing to make the journey. The first long-distance trade occurred between Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley in Pakistan around 3000 BC, historians believe. Long-distance trade in these early times was limited almost exclusively to luxury goods like spices, textiles, and precious metals. Cities that were rich in these commodities became financially rich, too, satiating the appetites of other surrounding regions for jewelry, fancy robes, and imported delicacies. It wasn't long after that trade networks crisscrossed the entire Eurasian continent, inextricably linking cultures for the first time in history. By the second millennium BC, former backwater island Cyprus had become a major Mediterranean player by ferrying its vast copper resources to the Near East and Egypt, regions wealthy due to their own natural resources such as papyrus and wool. Phoenicia, famous for its seafaring expertise, hawked its valuable cedarwood and linens dyes all over the Mediterranean. China prospered by trading jade, spices, and later, silk. Britain shared its abundance of tin.
My hands hurt now :')
Anyways Hope this helped, Have a nice day!
Answer:
E
Explanation:
The power of the President to refuse to approve a bill or joint resolution and thus prevent its enactment into law is the veto. ... This veto can be overridden only by a two-thirds vote in both the Senate and the House. If this occurs, the bill becomes law over the President's objections.
Answer: Regulators promote the interests of the firms they regulate.
Explanation: Capture theory of regulation asserts that regulators promote the interest of the firms they regulate. The result is that an agency that are charged with acting in the public interest, instead acts in ways that benefit the industry it is supposed to be regulating. Capture theory of regulation is a theory that explains agency established to regulate an industry for the benefit of society acts in the opposite to promote the benefit of the industry.
Regulatory capture is an economic theory which asserts that regulatory agencies may come to be dominated by the industries or interests they are charged with regulating. The captured agency begins to advance the interests of the industry rather than protecting the consumers. Problems arise when a regulating agency acts in the interests of regulated industry to the detriment of the general public.
Answer:
Federalism is a mixed or compound mode of government that combines a general government (the central or "federal" government) with regional governments (provincial, state, cantonal, territorial or other sub-unit governments) in a single political system. Its distinctive feature, exemplified in the Constitution of the United States, is a relationship of parity between the two levels of government established.[1] Federalism is thus a form of government in which powers are divided between two levels of government of equal status
