1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
taurus [48]
3 years ago
9

Write an expression that shows how to multiply 7×256

Mathematics
1 answer:
rewona [7]3 years ago
3 0
Hello! what I like to do is multiply by 10s and subtract the difference, so one thing you could do is 10x256-(3x256)! your final answer will be 1792, hope this helped! ;)
You might be interested in
A triangle has sides with lengths of 60 centimeters, 63 centimeters, and 87 centimeters. Is it a right triangle
lozanna [386]
We can check this by seeing if Pythagorean's theorem applies. The longest side is the hypotenuse, so let's see if this is true:
60^2+63^2 = 87^2
7569 = 7569

This is, indeed correct, thus, this <em>is </em><em>a right triangle.</em>
5 0
3 years ago
Liam is very excitrd to be getting a great deal on an iPad. it was originally $500 but he will only be paying $325. What Percent
DerKrebs [107]
You have to subtract do it will come out as 175. learn how to subtract big digets and then you will know how to do it tell your teacher that you need help with that.
8 0
3 years ago
The Gomes family is on a road trip. On the first day, they drove a distance shown as 3 1/2 inches on a map. The actual distance
marissa [1.9K]
1/r = (3 1/2)/245
(3 1/2)r = 245
r = 245/3 1/2
r = 70

scale is 1 in to 70 miles.
6 0
3 years ago
1. Using the Law of Syllogism, what conclusion can you draw from the following two statements?
uysha [10]
These are 8 questions and 8 answers. Given that the answers exceeded the number of characters you can see all the answers in the file attached.

<span>Question1. Using the Law of Syllogism, what conclusion can you draw from the following two statements?

If two angles are right angles, then they have the same measure.
If two angles have the same measure, then they are congruent.

Answer:

If two angles are right angles, then they are congruent.

Justification:

The law of sylllogism is a typy of logical reasoning used when there are two conditionals where the hypothesis of one is the conclusion of the other.

This is the scheme of the law of syllogism

statement    hypothesis  then   conclusion
   1                    p             →         q
   2                    q             →         r

Reasoning        p             →         r

As you see that is a kind of transitivity if p then q and if q then r implies if p then r.

Here you have:

p: if two angles are right angles
q: they  have the same measure
r: they are conngruent

So, from p → q and q → r, you can derive the conclusion p → r, which is if two angles are right angles they are congruent.


Qestion 2. Does the following argument illustrate the Law of Syllogism?

Given: If the power is cut, then the refrigerator will not work.
If the refrigerator will not work, then the food will spoil.

Conclude: If the power is cut, then the food will spoil.

Answer: yes

Justification:

As explained if the first answer, the law of syllogism permit to conncatenate two conditionals, where the conclusion of one is the hypothesis of the other permiting to conclude the validity of a third conditional through the reasoning:

first conditional:      if p then q
second contitional: if q then r

conclusion: if p then r.

In your question:

p: if the power is cut
q: the refrigerator will not work
r: the food will spoil

So, you have the exact structure of the syllogism law:

if the power is cut, then the refrigerator will not work
if the refrigerator will not work, then the food will spoil

Therefore, you conclude if the power is cut then the food will spoil.


Question 3. Does the following argument illustrate the Law of Detachment?

Given: If the fuse has blown, then the light will not go on.
The light will not go on.

Conclude: The fuse has blown.

Answer: no

Justification:

The law of detachment is the logical reasoning that permits you to derive the conclusion when the hypothesis on a conditional is true.

This is the scheme of the law of detachment:

conditional:                       if p , then q
hypothesis affirmation:     p is true

Conclusion: q is true

In this case:

The conditional is "if the fuse is blown, then the light will not go on:, so you are not affirming the hypothesis when you say "the light will not go on", which means that this is not the use of the law of detachment.

Question 4. Using the Law of Syllogism, what conclusion can you draw from the following two statements?

If it rains, then the roof leaks.
If the roof leaks, then the ceiling gets damaged.

Answer: If it rains, then the ceiling gets damaged.

Justification:

Law of syllogism:

conditional 1: if p then q
conditional 2: if q then r

conclusion: if p then r.

So, if it rains, then the roof leaks, and if the roof leaks, then the ceiling gets damaged, is the exactly the structure of the syllogism law that permits to conclude if it rains, then the ceiling gets damaged.

Question 5. Does the following argument illustrate the Law of Detachment?

Given: If the power has been cut, then the refrigerator does not work.
The power has been cut.

Conclude: The refrigerator does not work.

Answer: yes

Justification:

conditional:
if the power has ben cut, then the refrigerator does not work

hypothesis: if the power has been cut
conclusion: the refrigerator does not work

Reasoning: the hypothesis is affirmed (the power has been cut) then you conclude, by the detachment law, that the conclusion (the regrigerator does not work) is true.


Question 6. Use the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism to draw a conclusion from the following true statements.

If you do not get enough sleep, then you will be tired.
If you are tired, then you cannot pay attention in school.

Answer:
Telling that you only got three hours of sleep on Tuesday is the affirmation of the hypothesis of the first statement: "you only got three hours of sleep on Tuesday night". So you can conclude by the detachment law the conclusion "you are tired on Tuesday".

Now, that the conclusion of the first statement has been proved, which is the hypothesis of the other conditional, by the law of syllogism the conclusion of the second conditional (you cannot pay attencion in school on Wednesday) has been proved.

</span>
Download pdf
5 0
3 years ago
Isabel is thinking of an even number between 234 and 250 . The sum of the digits is double the digit in the ones place. What is
Dvinal [7]
Since the required number is between 234 and 250, then the first digit of the number is 2 and the second digit can either be 3 or 4.

Let the second and the third digits be x and y respectively, then

2 + x + y = 2y

Consider when the second digit is 3, then

2 + 3 + y = 2y
5 = y

Thus, the number is 235.

Similarly, consider when the second digit is 4, then

2 + 4 + y = 2y
6 = y

Thus, the number is 246.

Since the required number is an even number, therefore, Isabel's number is 246.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the slope of y=-1/2x+3
    9·2 answers
  • Mandy built a pyramid for her project on Egypt with a
    10·2 answers
  • .<br> What is the surface area of this figure? Round your answer to the nearest tenth.
    13·1 answer
  • Classify the system of equations 1/3x+y+2=0 1/2x+y-5=0 A. intersecting B. parallel C. coincident
    8·2 answers
  • Question 1<br> Given f(x) = 2. 1x + 12, find f(5).<br> Your answer:
    10·1 answer
  • Please can someone help me with this question. Thanks so much.
    14·2 answers
  • Please help, due today.. any guesses?!
    14·1 answer
  • Help I don’t understand
    14·1 answer
  • In number 8 the options are
    5·2 answers
  • 1. What is the volume of 0.75 liters expressed in mm cubed?​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!