Answer:
"the pessimists underestimate our decision-making accuracy because of factors such as choosing questions that contradict people's schemas"
Explanation:
Thaler is together with Daniel Khaneman one of the parents of behavioral economics. This branch focuses on explaining and even looking for meaning in our economic behavior. In other words, why we make the decisions we make regarding our money.
In many social sciences, two different points of view about our rationality coexist today: the pessimist, who sees our limitations as systematic errors at the root of our possible irrational behavior; and the optimist, who conceives these limits as ecological advantages. The first point of view, the pessimist, is maintained by Tversky and Kahneman in their research program on heuristics and biases, and is also based on the theory of "little shoves" or nudges, which Thaler and Sunstein propose following that approach of Tversky and Kahneman.
The second, the optimist, has been developed by Gerd Gigerenzer and the Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition (ABC) at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, and by other evolutionary psychologists such as Leda Cosmides and John Tooby.
Answer:
<em>Warm climate and rich soil of Southern Colonies were subitable to support plantation. ... New England's cold climate and rocky soil could not easily support large plantations.</em>
Hope This Helped
we should live with self respect because it's our right and sustainable environment should be implemented for it
Answer:
According to Marx, division of labour is imposed on workers so that the capitalists may benefit. Durkheim stresses cooperation, whilst Marx stresses exploitation and conflict
Answer:
d. Either A or C
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Big Corp will likely win if it can establish as a defense that either Pam was denied the promotion for legitimate non-discriminatory reasons or the denial of the promotion was based on mixed motives. Any of these two defenses would tell the court that there were other reasons as to why Pam was denied the promotion and it is not due to gender, which would make Pam's argument invalid.
