Answer:
a random & coincidental occurrence
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Oleg's predictive accuracy can be attributed as being a random & coincidental occurrence. This is mainly due to the fact that making this prediction correctly 7 times in a row has extremely low odds of happening and those odds keep getting worse the more times he tosses the coin.
It would be A because shes only 12 and not yet ready for pubic hair or breast growth
That statement is true
If fishing related activities are left unregulated by the government, fishers could utilize dangerous method such as using bombs that might destroy the ecosystem in the fresh water. This could make the fish population in a certain area become extinct.
Regulating fishing in freshwater would prevent such things from happening. This create positive economic impact by ensuring that the source of income would not be eliminated from the destruction of environment.
