Yes, I checked your addition with a calculator and 3965 + 5657 = 9622.
I am assuming that distance = frequent-flier points.
Good luck and hope this helps! :)
It is usually noted that correlation does not imply causation, but there are some correlations which are causation as well.
A correlation is when there is a relationship between two variables while causation is when the outcome of one variable affects the outcome of the other variable.
From the first option, though there may be a positive relationship between sales of jeans and sales of slacks, but the purchase of jeans does not mean that you have to purchase a slack, thus, there is no causation.
For the second option, though there may be positive relationship between <span>the number of aisles and the number of products in a supermarket, but a supermarket can have many aisles with few products, i.e. many aisles does not automatically imply many products, thus, there is no causation.
For the third option, though there may be a positive relationship between </span><span>the number of swimmers and the number of sunbathers at a beach, but all swimmers in a beach are not sunbathers and all sunbathers are not swimmers. Thus, a swimmer does not imply a sunbather and a sunbather does not imply a swimmer. Thus, there is no causation.
For the last option, it is generally known that the more you practice an activity, the better you get in that activity. Thus, there exist a relationship between </span><span>the number of hours spent practicing archery and the number of bull's-eyes an archer can hit and there also exist causation because the number of bull's-eye an archer can hit is directly dependent on the number of hours the archer spent practicing.
Therefore, the </span><span>correlation that is most likely a causation is </span><span>the positive correlation between the number of hours spent practicing archery and the number of bull's-eyes the archer can hit.</span>
Hey!
Myles had 185 songs. He purchased 30 extra songs.
30 ÷ 185 = 0.162 = 16.2%
Answer ⇒ 16.2%
Hope this helps! :)
Domain = x<18000(You cant og a negative number)
Am I actually supposed to graph it? enter the equation on desmos.com
It takes longer to make the same altitudinal gain
t=50log(18000/(18000-4000))=50log(18000/14000)=5.457
Answer:
1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
from one point to another it goes up 1 and over two. so rise over run, 1 over 2
