It should be noted that when demand for a product is unit elastic and one would expect sales to equal: 5 units.
<h3>What is elastic demand?</h3>
An elastic demand can be regarded as the demand whereby change in quantity demanded due to a change in price is large.
An inelastic demand entails change in quantity demanded due to a change in price is small.
Learn more about elastic demand at;
brainly.com/question/24384825
For the Joneses, Steve is putting together a market analysis and has chosen three comparable homes. Steve should Zero Adjustment alter the joneses' proper behavior in any way.
Sensors and instruments must produce an output that is a precise, predictable, and repeatable function of their input in every measurement setting. A 0 - 10 Bar pressure transmitter, for instance, might have a 0 - 10 V output that, starting with 0 V output for a 0 Bar pressure measurement, corresponds to its 0 - 10 Bar measurement range in a linear manner. To make sure that its output is indeed 0 V for a 0 Bar input, the transmitter must be calibrated. When this isn't the case, there needs to be a way to alter, or "zero," the output. The usage of an electronic gadget.
Learn more about Zero Adjustment here
brainly.com/question/5019807
#SPJ4
1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
Answer:
Alex may have to lower the price to convince Clara to buy a second slice.
Explanation:
Marginal utility is an economic concept that says that a consumer recieves more marginal utility in the first consumption of a good or services than in the second and the subsequents. In fact with each consumption the marginal utility reduces, this effect is known as diminishing marginal utility.
One of the the methods to reduce the effects of the diminishing marginal utility is to reduces prices. As the utility of a product decreases as its consumption increases, consumers are willing to pay smaller amount of money for more of the product.
Answer:
235,000 total overhead
Explanation:
First we calculate the rate for activity
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&Cost&Pool&Rate\\Setups&60,000&24,000&2.5\\Inspections&120,000&24,000&5\\Assembly&280,000&28,000&10\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26Cost%26Pool%26Rate%5C%5CSetups%2660%2C000%2624%2C000%262.5%5C%5CInspections%26120%2C000%2624%2C000%265%5C%5CAssembly%26280%2C000%2628%2C000%2610%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Next, we apply this rate to desk lamp
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&Rate&Desk&Overhead\\Setups&2.5&16,000&40,000\\Inspections&5&15,000&75,000\\Assembly&10&12,000&120,000\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26Rate%26Desk%26Overhead%5C%5CSetups%262.5%2616%2C000%2640%2C000%5C%5CInspections%265%2615%2C000%2675%2C000%5C%5CAssembly%2610%2612%2C000%26120%2C000%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Total Overhead will be the sum of each activity overhead
40,000.00 + 75,000.00 + 120,000.00 = 235,000 total overhead
