What are the little crowns for?

find the selling price per pound of a coffee mixture made from 8 pounds of coffee that sells fo $9.20 per pound and 12 pounds of

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

$6.98 per pound

Explanation:

The computation of the selling price per pound is shown below:

As we know that

8 pounds of coffee sells for $9.20 per pound which equal to

= 8 pounds × $9.20 per pound

= $73.6

And, 12 pounds of coffee is for $5.50 per pound which equal to

= 12 pounds × $5.50 per pound

= $66

The total value would be

= $73.6 + $66

= $139.60

And, the total number of pounds would be

= 8 pound + 12 pound

= 20 pounds

And we assume the selling price per pound be X

So, the equation would be

$139.60 = 20 pounds × X

So, X would be

= $139.60 ÷ 20 pounds

= $6.98 per pound

4 0

3 years ago

Use the following information to answer the question. There are three firms in an economy: X, Y, and Z. Firm X buys $200 worth o

Kamila [148]

Answer:

$2,775

Explanation:

The computation of the GDP of the economy is given below:

But before that the total value sold by three firms would be determined

Total amount of goods sold by X:

= X sells to Y + X sells to Z

= $150 + $75

= $225

Total amount of goods sold by Y:

= Y sells to X + Y sells to Z

= $200 + $50

= $250

Total amount of goods sold by Z:

= Z sells to X + Z sells to Y

= $300 + $250

= $550

Now

Amount of goods generated by X

= units of output × cost per unit

= 250 units × $4

= $1,000

Value of goods generated by Y

= units of output × cost per unit

= 300 units × $6

= $1,800

Value of goods generated by Z

= units of output × cost per unit

= 500 units × $2

= $1,000

Now GDP is

= [Goods generated by X - Valued added by X] + [Goods generated by Y - Value added by Y] + [Goods generated by Z - Value added by Z]

= [$1,000 - $225] + [$1,800 - $250] + [$1,000 - $550]

= $775 + $1,550 + $450

= $2,775

5 0

3 years ago

The cost constraint suggests that, even when the cost of providing accounting information exceeds its benefit, the financial acc

Alekssandra [29.7K]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The GAAP established that when the benefits of obtaining accounting information are lower than the costs of providing that information, the information should not be provided.

For example, sometimes there are very small differences in certain accounts that don't allow a balance sheet to be balanced. If the accounting error is very small, e.g. just a few hundred dollars, then it is not reasonable to have a whole audit team check all the financial statements again to determine what caused the error. An adjusting entry could be made to close the account balances.

Imagine you are an auditor that must check the physical inventory of a factory and some boxes containing supplies are misplaced. It might take you a whole day to count again all the supplies and materials, but is it worth it? If the supplies were really expensive, probably yes, but if they were cheap components, then probably no.

3 0

3 years ago

Wheat is the main input in the production of flour. if the price of wheat increases, all else equal, we would expect _______

Ostrovityanka [42]

Wheat is the main input in the production of flour. if the price of wheat increases, all else equal, we would expect b. Supply of flour to decrease.

Wheat product is read to reach32.2 million tonnes in 2022 – 23, 30 above the 10- time normal to 2021 – 22 of24.7 million tonnes.

Climate change-affiliated events play a decreasingly pivotal part in food instability. In summer of 2021, the world faced a wheat deficit due to heatwaves and famines that hit the US and Canada, the alternate and third-largest wheat exporters after Russia. the US Department of Agriculture prognosticated global wheat product would decline from to774.83 million tons in 2022 to 2023, from779.29 million tons last season. In nations similar as Iraq, the deficit is compounded by extreme water dearths.

Learn more about Supply of wheat here: brainly.com/question/26826780

#SPJ4

3 0

1 year ago

You have just won the multi-state lottery jackpot of $500,000,000! you have the option of receiving a check for $25,000,000 ever

tekilochka [14]

(10,000,000) / (20) = 500,000

(10,000,000) * (0.069) = 690,000 in taxes.

So (10,000,000) - (690,000) = 9,310,000 in a lump sum.

In 20 payments it would be $500,000 minus the taxes.

($500,000) - [(690,000)/(20)]

($500,000) - [$34,500] = $465,500

One lump sum would be $9,310,00. If they don't charge you taxes if you get the 20 payments per year, you would get $500,000. If you're charged taxes you'd get $465,500 per year.

6 0

3 years ago