Answer:
The null hypothesis is 
, in which x is the proportion tested.
The alternative hypothesis is 
Step-by-step explanation:
A recent article in a university newspaper claimed that the proportion of students who commute more than miles to school is no more than x.
This means that at the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of at most x, that is:
Suppose that we suspect otherwise and carry out a hypothesis test.
The opposite of at most x is more than x, so the alternative hypothesis is:
Perimeter is the sum of all sides in the figure. Here, all six sides are equal in length so it would be:
p = 6 * side
p = 6 * 3.9
p = 23.4 cm
In short, Your Answer would be: 23.4 cm
Hope this helps!
Answer:
He is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
multiplication and division are inverse operations so lets divide to see if he is correct
40.7/10=4.07
he is correct
Answer:
(0.102, -0.062)
Step-by-step explanation:
sample size in 2018 = n1 = 216
sample size in 2017 = n2 = 200
number of people who went for another degree in 2018 = x1 = 54
number of people who went for another degree in 2017 = x2 = 46
p1 = x1/n1 = 0.25
p2 = x2/n2 = 0.23
At 95% confidence level, z critical = 1.96
now we have to solve for the confidence interval =
<h2>
</h2>
= 0.02 ± 1.96 * 0.042
= 0.02 + 0.082 = <u>0.102</u>
= 0.02 - 0.082 = <u>-0.062</u>
<u>There is 95% confidence that there is a difference that lies between - 0.062 and 0.102 on the proportion of students who continued their education in the years, 2017 and 2018.</u>
<u></u>
<u>There is no significant difference between the two.</u>
Answer:
25.50=3.75h+0.50d
Step-by-step explanation:
