Answer:
A) They both had the Free Exercise Clause, or the First Amendment.
B) Wisconsin v. Yoder was about kids not finishing school while Employment Division v. Smith was about doing illegal drugs in the workplace. That is why they had different holdings even though they were both for a religious purpose.
C) A member of the public that is upset about the holding in Employment Division v. Smith could have people sign petitions to pass a new law that would overturn the holding made by the Supreme Court.
Explanation:
They have a Type B personality as this will mean that they are calm and have an easy going attitude
#5 is number b
#6 is number b as well.
these are the answers because the opposite side can be found when u put an arrow straight up from the angle. as you can see , if c had an angle , the opposite would be line segment AB
Answer:
C. Double Jeopardy Clause.
Explanation:
The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides a number of rights that a person has dealing with both civil as well as criminal proceedings. This Amendment included the "Self-Incriminatory Clause, Double Jeopardy Clause, and the Due Process Clause" among others.
In the case of Matthew, the Double Jeopardy Clause bars the prosecution from carrying out another trial on Matthew's case for the second time. This clause states that <em>"No person shall . . . be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb . . . . "</em> This means that a person cannot be tried more than once for the same crime.
Thus, the correct answer is option C.
