Why is irrigation important to agricultural communities

In recent years, psychologists have identified potential differences in the brain anatomy of gay men and their straight counterp

Ronch [10]

Answer:

Biological

Explanation:

The statements in the given question aims at studying the brains of the two genders therefore, the finding supports the " biological " perspective in psychology.

The biological perspective of psychology involves the study of the psychological issues of the different lives by examining the brain , nervous system or the genetics.

8 0

3 years ago

A difference between the Florida constitution and the US Bill of Rights is that the Florida constitution mentions race. religion

Alona [7]

Answer:

Physical disability

Explanation:

The Florida Constitution states that "No person shall be deprived of any right because of race, religion, national origin, or physical disability." On the other hand, the United States Constitution fails to mention anything regarding physical disability when talking about deprivation of rights. This is one of the differences between the US Constitution and Florida Constitution which are pretty much similar.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When did betsy ross start school

RUDIKE [14]

<span>Betsy went to a Friends (Quaker) public school. please make my answer the brainliest</span>

6 0

4 years ago

Hiroshi Morishima’s Wagami Andon demonstrates how the development of __________ has allowed lighting designers to use relatively

luda_lava [24]

Answer:

Hiroshi Morishima’s Wagami Andon demonstrates how the development of halogen lights has allowed lighting designers to use relatively flammable materials near the light source.

Explanation:

In halogen light bulbs illumination takes place when electricity produces enough heat to turn on a tungsten filament, therefore emitting light or “incandescence”. Even though it is safer than previous lighting technologies, nowadays LED lighting is considered much better, since it produces a lower temperature, being safer than halogen ligthing.

6 0

3 years ago

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged to the laws of civil society, locke invokes the notion of

marissa [1.9K]

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged

to the laws of civil society, Locke invokes the notion of "tacit consent." Rawls, who is also a "social contract theorist," of sorts, argues that a social contract can arise only from "hypothetical consent." What is the difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawls's notion of hypothetical consent?

a) Tacit consent requires actually expressing one's consent to the terms of the contract, whereas hypothetical consent simply requires that a citizen would have given consent under certain ideal conditions.

b) One who gives tacit consent implies consent to the terms of the contract through her actions, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent offers her explicit word on the basis of her particular desires.

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

d) Tacit consent is consent given in the state of nature, whereas hypothetical consent occurs within an ideal society.

e) Tacit consent is consent given by any rational agent, irrespective of her particular desires or ends, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent agrees to the terms of the contract based on some particular desire that she has.

Answer:

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Explanation:

The major difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawl's notion of hypothetical consent is that unlike tacit consent, someone that hypothetically consents means that the person would have likely consented to the terms of the contract if she was asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Tacit consent involves implicitly suggesting through actions that she accepts the terms of the contract.

5 0

3 years ago