Answer:
<u>B. There is sufficient evidence that the mean of the pressure required to open a certain valve has changed. </u>
Step-by-step explanation:
We make this conclusion based on these reasons:
- We are told that the "null hypothesis was rejected" after the <em>"manager feels that the pressure variability has changed.,</em> meaning the <u>null hypothesis was the opposite of what occurred; that is to say, it is the alternate hypothesis that proved true instead.</u>
- <em>"changes in the manufacturing process"</em> form what can be called "sufficient evidence" that the mean of the pressure required to open the valve has changed, thereby going against the null hypothesis.
It is based on the above reasons that the null hypothesis was rejected.
ln 5
e = ?
x
Keep in mind that y=e and y = ln x are inverse functions of one another.
ln 5
e , we can drop both the "e" and the "ln 5." We are left with 5 (answer).
ln 5
Alternatively, we could take the ln of both sides of y = e
which will result in ln y = (ln 5) ln e. Note that ln e = 1 (these two functions are inverses of one another).
Then we are left with ln y = ln 5. Dropping the "ln" operator from both sides,
y=5 (same as before).
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
it matches the table
Answer:
I think its 25 (proceed with caution)
Step-by-step explanation:
15×4=60 so basically 6.25×4=25
6.25 = 6 1/4
