Answer: A
Suppose that the last dollar that Victoria receives as income
brings her a marginal utility of 10 utils while the last dollar that
Fredrick receives as income brings him a marginal utility of
15 utils. If our goal is to maximize the combined total utility of
Victoria and Fredrick, we should
a. Redistribute income from Victoria to Frederick
b. Redistribute income from Fredrick to Victoria
c. Not engage in any redistribution because the current situation already maximizes total utility
d. None of the above
Step-by-step explanation:
Marginal utility is the added satisfaction derived from consuming an additional unit of a good or service. In the above question, Fredrick derives more satisfaction from his last dollar than Victoria, and will therefore achieve a higher marginal utility with additional income than Victoria does with her current income. If we want to maximize the combined utility, we should redistribute income from Victoria to Fredrick.
The logic behind this is the diminishing marginal utility. The first unit of a good consumed gives the highest level of satisfaction, marginal utility reduces with additional units consumed. In the same way, when we spend our income, we purchase the things that give us the maximum satisfaction first.
.
Answer:
34º
Step-by-step explanation: so basically you know a complementary angle is 2 angles that make a straight line and a vertical angle crosses which means 2 angles are congruent to each other so I drew a line that bisected the angle by drawing a line that cut through the right angle and i extended a line down from the right angle so now I have a vertical angle and a complementary so from here I labeled each angle <1 <2 <3 If I know angle 3 is 56º then I know 56 plus __ equals 90º I then subtracted 56 from 90 and I got 34 and since I am trying to figure out what angle 1 is I know that angle 1 and 2 are vertical angles therefore I know they are congruent to each other so <1 = 34º
The result of simplifying each number (-3)¹/₃ . (-3)¹/₃ . (-3)¹/₃ using the exponent rules is -3
To solve this exercise we have to resolve algebraic operations following the exponent rules.
(-3)¹/₃ . (-3)¹/₃ . (-3)¹/₃
Using the product rule that indicates that: the exponent result will be the addition of these exponents, we have:
(-3)¹/₃⁺ ¹/₃ ⁺ ¹/₃
(-3)³/₃
(-3)¹
-3
<h3>What is an exponent?</h3>
In mathematics an exponent is the number of time that a number, called (base) is multiplied by itself. It is also called, power or index.
Example: 3² = 3*3 = 9
Learn more about exponent at: brainly.com/question/847241
#SPJ4
The key calculation in this problem is figuring out <em>how many times 80 goes into 1,000,000</em>. I'll build up in steps here.
80 x 5 = 400. This gives us a building block on our way to 1,000,000. From here, we can go further and say that 400 x 5 = 2,000; that 2,000 x 5 = 10,000; and finally that 10,000 x 100 = 1,000,000. Altogether, starting from 80, that's
80 x 5 x 5 x 5 x 100 = 80 x 25 x 500 = <em>80 x 12,500</em>
So, since 80 goes into one million 12,500 times, it takes 12,500 minutes for the animal's heart to beat that 1,000,000 times.
Answer:
D is the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
For a: g(x) = 1 when x = 1, for f(x) 1^2 - 2(1) + 2 = 1, a is true.
For b: Both functions do have all real numbers for their domain, b is true
For c: the y-intercept of g(x) is x = 0, for f(x), it is 0^2 - 2(0) + 2 = 2, c is true
For d: g(3) = 7, f(3) = 3^2 - 2(3) + 2 = 5, d is false.
