Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
Y = x - 1
because the gradient is 1 and the y-intercept is -1
In an equation like that, y would double into 2y. But just keep in mind that what happens to one side must happen to another.
Answer:
241
Step-by-step explanation:
Simplify the following:
2^8 - 10 - 15/3
The gcd of -15 and 3 is 3, so (-15)/3 = (3 (-5))/(3×1) = 3/3×-5 = -5:
2^8 - 10 + -5
2^8 = (2^4)^2 = ((2^2)^2)^2:
((2^2)^2)^2 - 10 - 5
2^2 = 4:
(4^2)^2 - 10 - 5
4^2 = 16:
16^2 - 10 - 5
| 1 | 6
× | 1 | 6
| 9 | 6
1 | 6 | 0
2 | 5 | 6:
256 - 10 - 5
256 - 10 - 5 = 256 - (10 + 5):
256 - (10 + 5)
10 + 5 = 15:
256 - 15
| 2 | 5 | 6
- | | 1 | 5
| 2 | 4 | 1:
Answer: 241
