The best answer from the ones mentioned is the last one: encomienda.
Encomienda is a system where the stronger partner provides protection to the weaker one in exchange for goods and services.
Answer:
MY MOST EXCITING DAY IN SCHOOL
The most exciting day in my school life was when I was selected among other students to represent my school in a cultural dance competition. I attended Jesus Jesus Hominum Salvator college, it is a mixture of both girls and boys college.
Furthermore,during the selection process for those that will be chosen to form the cultural group, I was very tense because I really want to be selected. I love dancing from my childhood days and when any opportunity presents itself to me, I love to utilize it.We were told to audition that same day and my name was among the 20 student selected to form the cultural group. when i saw my name on the list of those selected, i literally leaped for jump and was super-excited.Rehearsal started that same day and an external dance tutor was invited to teach us several moves of the native “medaka” dance.
I was very excited and happy because I learnt a lot of great and wonderful moves and had a nice time with my fellow student. It is a day I will never forget in a hurry.
Explanation:
Answer:
Bearing in mind that it was Davidson that recommended the rope while stating the specific of the rope. The specifics of the rope would be considered facts, it is this facts that the court would find to be bounded to the warranty. On his part, Moon only stated the fact that he needs rope for his farm, but does not specify what he needs it for. The recommendation by Davidson for that specific rope is based only on the details that it would be used for the farm. This is pointing that, Moon is relying entirely on the seller, who knows about the product, to recommend him a type of rope.
However, there is need to put into consideration that Moon does not specify the exact use of the rope. This implies that Davidson states the he recommends the use of that specific rope.
With the argument back and forth between seller and buyer, there is no warranty at the instance that the seller breached an implied warranty of merchantability, but one can argue there was a
breach of implied warranty of particular purpose if it is taken into consideration that the use of that particular rope is not usually used in farms.
Explanation:
See answer
