Answer: The population after 3 hours is 13.9 mill.
Step-by-step explanation:
When we have an exponential with:
A = initial population.
r = constant relative growth rate:
t = time.
The function that models this is:
P(t) = A*e^(k*t)
In this case we know that:
A = 3.9 mill.
r = 0.4225 1.
Then the function that models the population of this yeast cell is:
P(t) = (3.9 mill)*e^(0.4225*t)
where t represents the time in hours.
Then if we want to know the population after 3 hours, we should replace t by 3.
P(3) = (3.9 mill)*e^(0.4225*3) = 13.85 mill.
And we want to round our answer to one decimal place, then we must look at the second decimal place, we can see that is a 5, so we should round up.
The population after 3 hours is 13.9 mill.
Answer:
- vertical scaling by a factor of 1/3 (compression)
- reflection over the y-axis
- horizontal scaling by a factor of 3 (expansion)
- translation left 1 unit
- translation up 3 units
Step-by-step explanation:
These are the transformations of interest:
g(x) = k·f(x) . . . . . vertical scaling (expansion) by a factor of k
g(x) = f(x) +k . . . . vertical translation by k units (upward)
g(x) = f(x/k) . . . . . horizontal expansion by a factor of k. When k < 0, the function is also reflected over the y-axis
g(x) = f(x-k) . . . . . horizontal translation to the right by k units
__
Here, we have ...
g(x) = 1/3f(-1/3(x+1)) +3
The vertical and horizontal transformations can be applied in either order, since neither affects the other. If we work left-to-right through the expression for g(x), we can see these transformations have been applied:
- vertical scaling by a factor of 1/3 (compression) . . . 1/3f(x)
- reflection over the y-axis . . . 1/3f(-x)
- horizontal scaling by a factor of 3 (expansion) . . . 1/3f(-1/3x)
- translation left 1 unit . . . 1/3f(-1/3(x+1))
- translation up 3 units . . . 1/3f(-1/3(x+1)) +3
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
The "working" is a matter of matching the form of g(x) to the forms of the different transformations. It is a pattern-matching problem.
The horizontal transformations could also be described as ...
- translation right 1/3 unit . . . f(x -1/3)
- reflection over y and expansion by a factor of 3 . . . f(-1/3x -1/3)
The initial translation in this scenario would be reflected to a translation left 1/3 unit, then the horizontal expansion would turn that into a translation left 1 unit, as described above. Order matters.
Answer:
You got it! ill do it now
Step-by-step explanation:
<span>To convert 12.5 to a fraction, consider the decimal portion of the number, .5. Since .5 is in the tenth spot of the decimal, it may be read as five-tenths, or 5/10. To reduce it to lowest terms, find the lowest common denominator, 5, and divide each by that number to get 1/2, or one-half. Thus, the number is now 12 1/2. To convert this mixed number into an entirely rational fraction, multiply the whole number, 12, by the denominator, 2, to get 24, then add the numerator, to end up with 25. This is the new numerator, so the rational number is 25/2. To check the work, divide 25 by 2 on a calculator or as a decimal equation, yielding 12.5.</span>
There are about 52 weeks in a year, so divide 25200 by 52 (484.6). He gets paid $484.60 per week. So he should spend a maximum of C. $485 on rent per month.