Answer:
The Case of the Supreme Court Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee nation in Georgia because it was decided that Georgia laws did not apply to Cherokee territory.
Explanation:
In the Worcester case v. Georgia, the Supreme Court denied Georgia jurisdiction and state authority over the Cherokee community. In other words, this meant that Georgia law and authority did not apply to Cherokee territory. Although this decision was a small victory for the Cherokee people, the decision was not very helpful as the state of Georgia totally ignored the Supreme Court decision and forced the Cherokee community to march west.
The Chinese exclusion act of 1882 allegedly stated that Chinese immigrants were no longer allowed in America. This was a form of discrimination because they were not welcomed even though they were a significant force of labor .
The United States Congress divided into two houses as all states have equal representation in one house to benefit smaller states, and representation is based on population in the other house to satisfy larger states.
Answer: Option C
Explanation:
The framers of U.S. Constitution have essentially organized the Congress into two establishments namely:
- the Senate, and
- the House of Representative.
The Connecticut Compromise proposed the division of Congress. It was proposed in the Constitutional Convention in 1787 by the Connecticut delegates, Oliver Ellsworth and Roger Sherman.
This object behind this proposal was to maintain the balance of interest of both the large as well as small states as the Constitution has bestowed equal voice to each State in the Senate whereas the criteria for representation in the House of Representative is the size of population of each State.
Answer:
It limited the House's ability to impose additional standards on representatives. Representative Jones votes for a bill favored by his constituents, although he does not support it.
Explanation:
plz mark me as brainiest
Answer:
Gerrymandering means to manipulate district boundaries in order to build political advantage i favour of one party. this phenomenon majorly works around the state (national) politics at the time of elections and mostly has a negative impact and is harmful with regards to healthy political and election environment.
Based on the above, it is quite evident that gerrymandering is an absolute threat to democracy. some of the impacts have been listed below:
It in a way creates circumstances that the politicians get more power and they can chose who their voters are going to be. Rather than giving the voters the power on whom they are going to chose.
It is used to help or hinder the a particular party/politician, which is mostly used in an unfair manner and regardless of the benefit to the larger group.
This method is largely used for the benefit and upliftment of the political parties and in the process the well being and upliftment of the community may go on a toss, as the primary motto is to favour winning of elections by a politician or political party.
As it hampers the transparency of the election system and does not provide equal rights and participation to the voters to chose their leader or ruling party. It directly hampers the democracy and voter participation rights. as all the process gets filtered and adultrated in the process of gerrymandering.
Explanation:
