1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lorasvet [3.4K]
3 years ago
8

What is special crime investigation​

Law
2 answers:
iren2701 [21]3 years ago
7 0
The Specialized Crime Section is a covert investigative unit comprised of the Intelligence Unit and the Sex Offender Apprehension and Registration Unit ( SOAR ). The investigators assigned to these various units are highly trained and motivated, each possessing a broad background in criminal investigative experience.
wolverine [178]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

a investigación de delitos es el proceso por el cual se descubre al autor de un delito, cometido o planeado.

Explanation:e spero que te ayude xd

You might be interested in
Hamburger in stomach contents.
Akimi4 [234]

Answer: i think it is D but it can be C too

so its one of thos

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
NEED HELP ASAP
liq [111]
The correct answer is state legislative
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
On Election Day, which Poll Worker position is responsible for the setup and breakdown of the EViD?
Liula [17]

Answer:

The Insepctor

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
How many male african american officials were elected in the us in 1970?
Sophie [7]
The answer to this question is b
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a presentence report?​
    6·1 answer
  • A German plaintiff had sold equipment to an American firm on open account. On the date the amounts were due, the American firm o
    10·1 answer
  • How can a case reach a federal court of appeals without having gone to trial in any court previously?
    9·1 answer
  • Sally is a world champion boxer. She got mad at Cathy and hit her, knowing she might die from being hit that hard. Cathy did not
    9·2 answers
  • 5. Because police communicate with so many types of people in such a wide variety
    12·2 answers
  • If you know Catmemeslol then report her please, she is sending hurtful comments. Please all I need you to do is get this message
    7·2 answers
  • Jenna works for the US criminal justice system. Her duties include counseling offenders who have been released early from their
    12·2 answers
  • Where does a consumer learn about the credit card interest rates in the schumer box?
    13·1 answer
  • The press is free to say whatever they want about whomever they want, regardless of whether they know it’s true.
    13·2 answers
  • How does the original Constitution explain the presidential election process? Who are electors? Why are there electors? In the s
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!