Answer:
The new position is 0.1865 m
Explanation:
As the context of the data is not available, thus following data is utilized from the question as attached above
x_relax=0.32 m
x_stiff=0.13 m
spring stiffness k=9 N/m
mass of block =0.073 kg
t=0.07 s
Velocity of the block is to be estimated thus
Force due to compression in spring is given as
F_s=k Δx
F_s=9(0.32-0.13)
F_s=1.71 N
Force on the block is given as
F_m=mg
F_m=0.073 x 9.8
F_m=0.71 N
Net Force
F=F_s-F_m
F=1.71-0.71 N
F=1 N
As Ft=Δp
So
Δp=1x0.07=0.07 kgm/s
Δp=p_final-p_initial
0.07=p_final-0
p_final=0.07 kgm/s
p_final=m*v_f
v_f=(p_final)/(m)
v_f=0.07/0.073
v_f=0.95 m/s
So now the velocity of the block is 0.95 m/s
time is 0.07 s
y_new=y_initial+y_travel
y_new=0.12+(0.95 x 0.07)
y_new=0.12+0.065
y_new=0.1865 m
So the new position is 0.1865 m
Answer:
0.3858 Nm
Explanation:
The torque of the couple is the dot product of the force vector and the couple vector from 1 end of the ruler to the center. This equals to the product of their magnitude times the cosine() of the angle made by their direction:

Good afternoon.
In the reference of the second car, itself is stopped! It is the same thing as adding the opposite speed vector of this car to the rest of the world. See below:
Begginning:
Car 1 Car 2
→ 85 km/h → 54 km
Going to the referential of car 2, adding ← 54 km/h to both cars:
New Reference:
Car 1 Car 2
(→85 km/h) + (←54 km/h) (→ 54 km/h) + (← 54 km/h)
Car 1 Car 2
→ 31 km/h 0 km/h
So, relative to car 2, car 1 has a velocity of<em> 31 km/h</em>
Answer:
1.28 m
Explanation:
You are given the initial speed that is 5 m/s. Since the coin is sent upwards, this means that the speed is positive according to the co-ordinate system in the y axis. Additionally, there is the gravity that curbs the coin in the opposite direction making the final speed becomes zero at the highest point, so the gravity takes negative sign.
So, from the explanation we have:



so, we use the following equation to find y (hight)





Answer:
the dependent variable is the one that changes because the independent variable was changed. The dependent isn't intentionally manipulated
Explanation: