Answer:
Probablemente no ya que el concepto de soberanía alimentaria en si mismo podría ser interpretado como anacrónico bajo el escenario económico actual, el cual está fuertemente globalizado a través de tratados de libre comercio y de propiedad intelectual, y también debido a la influencia de grandes multinacionales como Monsanto, incluso en mercados agrícolas, los cuales tienden a ser más protegidos que otros.
La realidad es que la soberanía alimentaria, como concepto que apunta hacia la autarquía económica, es una visión poco viable en la economía actual, y requeriría de una iniciativa política muy fuerte, y muy contestataria para poder ser llevada a cabo.
This is binomial
distribution problem. <span>
We are given that:</span>
n = sample size = 500
p = proportion which
burns wood = 0.27,
q = proportion which
does not burn wood = 1-p = 0.73
<span>
A. Mean is calculated as:</span>
Mean = n*p
Mean = 500 * 0.27
Mean = 135
<span>
B. Variance is calculated as:</span>
Variance = n*p*q
Variance = 500*0.27*0.73
Variance = 98.55
<span>
C. Standard deviation is calculated as:</span>
Standard deviation = sqrt(variance)
Standard deviation =
sqrt(98.55)
<span>Standard deviation =
9.93</span>
D. A 30-minute walk each day provides health benefits for employees,
so we should start a walking group.
Short answer D
Labor costs could cause that type of inflation as well.
C is eliminated because Push Cost Inflation is cost increase in what it takes to make a product.
B is gone because it is really deflation not inflation. This answer implies a drop in price. Inflation is an increase in price.
A subsides are an increase in capital. That will lower the price or keep it stable. Not A
Yes, Rubio will be able to successfully sue and collect the $1,000 later because their agreement was not fulfilled.
<h3>What is an agreement in contract?</h3>
In contract, an agreement is an element of what makes a contract valid. When an agreement is breached, then, the aggrieved party have a right to void the contract.
In conclusion, the answer is yes because Rubio will be able to successfully sue and collect the $1,000 later because their agreement was not fulfilled.
Read more about agreement
<em>brainly.com/question/997952</em>