by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
An example of theory about the relationship between language and thought is Vygotsky's philosophy.
What is Vygotsky's philosophy?
Vygotsky's philosophy serves as theory of human cognitive development and explain that Language plays multiple roles in behavior and thinking.
It should be noted that Language of thought theories explain the relationship between mental representation and linguistic structure.
Learn more about theory at;
brainly.com/question/11555274
Answer:
I think it mean to ofc leave things bad or unresolved. It makes you feel uncertain. Like leaving things on a good note means to leave things just right
Explanation: