Answer:
There are many differences between substitute goods and complementary goods.Like as:
Substitute goods: When a goods or service replace the other one or used as the alternative then it is a substitute goods.
Complementary goods: When a goods or service complements the other one they are complementary goods. It means during the consume of one goods or service,consumer needs it's complementary goods.
Ice cream: Smoothie is a substitute and pastry is a complementary goods.
Baseball game tickets: Work is a substitute and popcorn and drink is a complementary goods.
Pencil: pen is a substitute and notebook is a complementary goods
Explanation:
Answer:
Most of them wouldn't agree with the sentiment.
Explanation:
The welfare program created by the Britain was aimed to provide several aids or the poor people in Britain. These aids do not discourage people to work. They only cover basic necessities that most people have (such as food and shelter)
Ever since the implementation of welfare programs, the average standard of living in Britain has been gradually increasing. Along with the average employment and life expectancy.
The answer would be Nevada. It's said that theyŕe mostly found in the interior of northern California west of the Sierra Nevada
Regarding respiratory changes at birth, changes in blood flow that occur lead to the closure of the foramen ovale the embryonic interatrial connection.
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a hole between the left and right atria (upper chambers) of the heart. This hole exists in everyone before birth, but most often closes shortly after being born. PFO is what the hole is called when it fails to close naturally after a baby is born.
The foramen ovale is an aperture in the muscular tissue between the left and right atrium that allows blood to cross the atria and bypass pulmonary circulation during fetal development.
To know more about foramen ovale here
brainly.com/question/6819491
#SPJ4
Answer:
What best explains this is:
2. mere presence hypothesis.
Explanation:
The mere presence hypothesis serves to explain social facilitation. According to it, <u>some people tend to be more aware of evaluation when in the mere presence of others. For that reason, they tend to perform better on tasks that are simple or well-rehearsed</u>. For instance, an athlete such as a weightlifter may lift heavier weights in the presence of others than if he were by himself. <u>On the other hand, those same people tend to perform worse in the presence of others when the task is complex or new. </u>
<u>Notice that this seems to be the case with the magician we are analyzing. She performed better in the presence of an audience, but only when it came to the simpler tricks. When it came to her grand finale, she failed. Her big finale certainly had more complexity than the other tricks. Her performance is, therefore, explained by the mere presence hypothesis.</u>
