Evidence that the powers of leaders should be limited us given by<u> B. </u><u>citing incidences</u><u> of </u><u>violence </u><u>that arise when religious or government </u><u>leaders </u><u>go</u><u> too far</u><u> in </u><u>exerting power.</u>
You did not include the text in question but this should be the correct answer.
When power is unlimited:
It can sometimes be abused it because leaders will not know where to stop
Leaders might overexert their power such that it leads to violence as people rebel and they try to enforce their right to rule.
This is what happened in the American Revolution, the French Revolution and the partly in the Glorious Revolution (there was no violence here but it happened because the King wanted to overexert himself).
We can therefore conclude that power should be limited unless it could lead to violence as all powerful leaders go too far in exerting their authority.
the point in decision making when social, economic, and political concerns begin to affect science and how it is used to solve problems. Although scientific research identified the problem, it doesn't necessarily mean science will be used to solve it.
This slogan; small family, happy family, has encouraged the Indian population programs which had them limit families to one child - A. This was similarly to the one-child policy of China but was much less successful.