Evidence that the powers of leaders should be limited us given by<u> B. </u><u>citing incidences</u><u> of </u><u>violence </u><u>that arise when religious or government </u><u>leaders </u><u>go</u><u> too far</u><u> in </u><u>exerting power.</u>
You did not include the text in question but this should be the correct answer.
When power is unlimited:
It can sometimes be abused it because leaders will not know where to stop
Leaders might overexert their power such that it leads to violence as people rebel and they try to enforce their right to rule.
This is what happened in the American Revolution, the French Revolution and the partly in the Glorious Revolution (there was no violence here but it happened because the King wanted to overexert himself).
We can therefore conclude that power should be limited unless it could lead to violence as all powerful leaders go too far in exerting their authority.
French- That is one of Canada's Official Languages, and they occupy much of the province of Quebec, which is also the largest province in size in the country. They settled in the early 17th century before the British even touched this country.
A major criticism of the American system of federalism is that it is "<span>C) inefficient in responding to crises involving multiple levels of government". Many say that there are "too many cooks in the kitchen" in this sense. </span>
To let everyone know about what has happened and be ale to justify as to why he wanted to declare war on declaring war upon the Japanese Empire. His speech was touching to the people.
