- The correct answer is D. Substantive due process. The reason is simple, by passing the law, Congress has facilitated the compliance of federal authorities with the principle of procedural due process (the principle that if the government is going to deprive a person of life, liberty and/or property they have to follow the proper procedures as per the laws and the Constitution). Normally, the Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizure. However by passing this law Congress has bypassed such protections by stating that searching the home of anyone suspected of terrorism without a warrant is valid under the new law. However, the principle of Substantive Due process is clear: the fact that procedural due process was respected under the new laws does not prevent such law from being unconstitutional as it violates the Fourth amendment.
<u>Answer:</u>
Authoring of the Texas constitution was dominated by common people's interests and an organization called the Grange.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The Constitutional Convention of 1875 culminated in the birth of the Constitution of Texas.
- The authors of this constitution intended to vest the powers of government into the hands of the people of the state.
- The Grange's were the ones who insisted that the constitution be framed with the common people at its core.
- The document of the Constitution thus ended up having articles dedicated to suffrage, education, general provisions for the public, etc.
The 13th amendment abolished slavery within the U.S or any place subject to their jurisdiction
I think it is to help the president make certain decision and if he/she dies they take over
