The greatest priority in every State is security. As a matter of fact, a nation without a powerful military can be an attractive target for terrorists. However, countries present different realities and what may seem the best investiment for one country might not be the right alternative for another. It all depends on the situation and the level of development of each nation-state. If we take into consideration that the money ($11 billion) the U.S spent in Iraq, that was labeled as "wasted" later on, could have paid over 220,000 teachers' salaries, the answer to this question becomes very obvious. In my opinion, having a balance between both investments is vital. But, if I had to choose, I'd choose to invest in infrastructure because they're essential to a country's economy and prosperity; a country that is economically developed and prosper will manage its military successfully.
What lead to the Boston Tea Party was “taxation without representation.”
It was a machine for spinning more than one spindle at a time
The way that Accenture plans to achieve its sustainability goals is to reuse or recycle e-waste and ensure the reduction in water usage.
Accenture sustainability is vital as it helps organizations achieve substantial improvement in performance and value for their stakeholders. This is vital as it helps clients to leverage their assets to drive innovation and profitable growth.
The way that Accenture plans to achieve its sustainability goals is to reuse or recycle e-waste and ensure the reduction in water usage. This is vital in order to provide a cost and energy efficient way in order to manage computation resources.
Read more about sustainability on:
brainly.com/question/25789642
Should be El Salvador as it only has a pacific coast.