Violence can be justified, but only when defending yourself or others. Violence cannot be justified if it's used against someone that isn't hurting you or others. For example, if you were being attacked by a stranger, you would need to protect yourself. Which would be justified. Though, if you attacked someone on the street for no reason, that's morally wrong.
Answer: The most plausible justification for violence is when it is performed in response to other violence. This is the mildest form of the argument in favor of violence.
I believe the answer is: <span>monocular; binocular Monocular cues happen when we see distant subjects</span><span> that subtend smaller visual angles than near objects. Binocular cues happen when we Include things such as eye convergence and stereopsis in our vision.</span>
