1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naily [24]
2 years ago
6

Which of the following groups had a political outlook similar to that of Populist farmers in the late 1800s? railroad industrial

ists the Knights of Labor Democratic senators Republican senators.
SAT
1 answer:
aivan3 [116]2 years ago
8 0

Answer: knight of labor <3

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Based on the given information, determine which company has a lower minimum and find the minimum value. g(x) at (10, 855) f(x) a
Gekata [30.6K]

The minimum production cost of company 2 is greater than the minimum production cost of company 1. We arrived at this value by comparing the production cost of both companies.

<h3>What is meant by minimum production cost?</h3>

The overall cost incurred by a company to manufacture a product or provide services is known as the cost of production.

The objective of every company is to keep this cost at minimum, hence the minimum production cost.

<h3>How do find minimum Production Cost?</h3>

Recall that the production function is given as:

f(x) = 0.25x² - 8x + 600

Inserting the values given by the schedule we have

  1. f(6) = 0.25(6²) - 8(6) + 600 = 561
  2. f(8) = 0.25(8²) - 8(8) + 600 = 552
  3. f(10) = 0.25(10²) - 8(10) + 600 = 545
  4. f(12) = 0.25(12²) - 8(12) + 600 = 540
  5. f(14) = 0.25(14²) - 8(14) + 600 = 537

For company 2, we are given the various production costs as;

x   - g(x)

6  - 862.2

8  - 856.8

10 -  855

12 -  856.8

14 - 862.2

Juxtaposing the above, we can infer that the minimum production cost of company 2 is greater than the minimum production cost of company 1.

Learn more about minimum production cost at:
brainly.com/question/9871118
#SPJ1

Download txt
7 0
2 years ago
Discuss your reaction to the following statement, companies should not provide training to employees because it is the responsib
serious [3.7K]

Answer:

The statement "companies should not provide training to employees because it is the responsibility of individuals to possess the necessary knowledge and skills prior to becoming employed, is entirely wrong. In just one counter example of how this statement would not persist in work places is public service positions. Consistent demand is needed for public service employees. No college or educational program educates an individual on exact protocol on a specific public service field, further training is always required to provide top quality service. Also another example is in the food industry. Waitresses' or Waiters' responsibilities vary between different restaurants protocols and rules. Training is needed and required for someone to work in that specific restaurant, no one is able to "possess the necessary knowledge and skills prior to becoming employed" due to variety of rules, regulations, and preferences in work places.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
A 40-kilogram mass is moving across a horizontal surface at 5.0 m/s. what is the magnitude of the net force required to bring th
aliina [53]

Answer:

25 N

Explanation:

Use the equation F = m(Vf–Vi) / Δt.

average force = mass (final velocity - initial velocity) / change in time

F = 40 kg(5.0 m/s) / 8.0 s = 200 / 8.0 = 25 kgm / s^2 = 25 Newtons

4 0
2 years ago
9. The length of a rectangle is 3 cm greater than
Alla [95]

Answer:

l = 18

w = 9

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Jack invested $500 in the shares of a company x and $750
-BARSIC- [3]

Assuming he sold all the shares of both companies for $600 and $900 respectively. what the ratio of return on investment from company x to that from company y will be is : 2:3

First step is to calculate x return on investment

x return on investment = $600 - $500

x return on investment= $100

Second step is to calculate y return on investment

y return on investment= $900 - $750

y return on investment= $150

Now let determine the ratio of return on investment from company x to that from company y

Using this formula

Ratio of return on investment=x return on investment/y return on investment

Let plug in the formula

Ratio of return on investment=100/150

Ratio of return on investment=2/3

Ratio of return on investment=2:3

Inconclusion assuming he sold all the shares of both companies for $600 and $900 respectively. what the ratio of return on investment from company x to that from company y will be is : 2:3

Learn more here:

brainly.com/question/24807055

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The SAT Reading Test has 3 different categories, what are they?
    11·2 answers
  • Why are people wrong on this app
    6·2 answers
  • Consider the chemical equation. CuCl2 2NaNO3 Right arrow. Cu(NO3)2 2NaCl What is the percent yield of NaCl if 31.0 g of CuCl2 re
    9·1 answer
  • How are nebulae and stars related? select the three correct answers.
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following sparked the beginning of the spanish-american war
    7·1 answer
  • Answer the following question in 3-4 complete sentences. Define the term, advertisement. Look at the advertisements below. Which
    5·1 answer
  • When jaxson turned 13, he started to have migraine headaches. The migraines became so frequent that jaxson could not attend scho
    15·1 answer
  • Gary’s unpaid credit card balance is $2543. 32. His apr is 17. 4%, and he made one new transaction for $320. What is his new bal
    15·1 answer
  • On april 21, the altitude of polaris, as viewed from a location in new york state, was measured as 41.3°. what will the altitude
    5·1 answer
  • What is the solubility of mg(oh)₂ at a ph of 12.70? (ksp mg(oh)₂ is 1.6 × 10⁻¹³)
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!