Answer:
B
Explanation:
A developed state that is experiencing political stability is most likely to experience peaceful transitions of power. Since the sentence contains the word stability, this means the answer will be positive. Therefore, B is the only answer that contains that.
This is an interesting question, however very subjective. There are no set 'correct' or 'incorrect' answers, unless this question is linked with a broader concept that you have been learning about? But here would be my answer...
Firstly, I do believe this is impossible. But this is a pretty closed answer, unless I give reasoning. It also depends what you mean by harmony? In this answer I am assuming you mean no conflict- so forgive me if I have totally misunderstood.
1- Oppression
It is inevitable that people will have different agendas, or motives for wanting to do certain things. This causes conflict, obviously including negative conflict. To achieve 'Harmony', some people would have to compromise on their beliefs and actions- and how they live their lives. Who would be the ones compromising? If there was complete harmony, these people would be unable to question this, or even unwilling. People would most probably become 'brainwashed', unaware of the compromises they are making in their lives. This brings up another very interesting question- Is peace and harmony more important than free will?
2- Extreme boredom/ lack of meaning to anything
Would harmony even exist if there was no conflict? To put it in other words, how would you explain harmony without referring either directly or indirectly to conflict?
What gives people the drive to fight for what they want? Not all conflict is negative, and one conflict can appear positive to one person, and negative to another.
What would we do all day? Many jobs would simply cease to exist- Lawyer? No. Relies on conflict. Social worker? Same thing. Even less obviously linked jobs such as musicians, teachers, politicians, athletes, would be affected. Ever noticed how on the news, many of the stories are about conflict? That is what interests us. Gives us something to debate about. There would be no diversity in culture, perhaps we would all be vegetarians or vegans (if 'everyone' refers to all living organisms on earth). Upon further reflection, harmony doesn't seem as much of a 'utopia', or perfect world, as perhaps it first seems
Answer:
Medieval Japans geography drastically affected their interactions with other cultures as they are an island, this allowed them to stay isolationist/keep little to no interaction with other cultures.
Explanation:
Question is pretty broad and seems more like an essay question but TLDR they are an island which let them stay away from everyone else
The correct answer is option C.
Time zones are measured in relation to their distance from coordinated universal time.
<h3><u>
What are time zones?</u></h3>
- A time zone is a region that adheres to a common standard time for social, commercial, and legal activities.
- Because it is easy for locations in frequent communication to preserve the same time, time zones typically follow the boundaries between countries and their subdivisions rather than rigidly following longitude.
- From Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), which ranges from UTC12:00 to UTC+14:00, all time zones are defined as offsets.
- The offsets are often a whole number of hours, although some zones—like those in India, South Australia, and Nepal—are offset by an additional 30 or 45 minutes.
Higher latitude regions occasionally observe daylight saving time, which often involves advancing local time by an hour in the spring and summer.
Know more about time zones with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/3818424
#SPJ4
Answer:
Structuralist
Explanation:
Gestalt psychology is a type of psychology that was created by Max Wertheimer, Wolfgang Köhler, and Kurt Koffka. This type of psychology is based on understanding and perceiving the "whole" person, as opposed to its components. It argues that a person's experiences are more than simply a collection of the various parts or elements of consciousness. This idea contrasts with that of the structuralist approach.
