The first one is c
the second one is c
the third one is a
Answer:
actor/observer discrepancy; fundamental attribution error
Explanation:
Actor-Observer bias: In social psychology, the term actor-observer bias or discrepancy is defined as the phenomenon in which an individual tends to attribute his or her behavior to external cause and therefore attributing the other person's behavior as an internal cause.
Fundamental attribution error: In psychology, the term fundamental attribution error was proposed by Lee Ross who was a social psychologist during 1977. It is defined as the phenomenon in which an individual describes the other person's behavior based on the internal factors including personality whereas underestimating the external factors influence including situational influence.
In the question above, Wally's behavior can be explained in terms of actor-observer discrepancy whereas John behavior is explained in terms of the fundamental attribution error.
The Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Answer:
Yes, it was. The US was, like the rest of the world, soldiering on towards the end of a dark period of human history that had seen the single most costly conflict (in terms of life) in history, and they chose to adopt a stance that seemed to limit the amount of casualties in the war, by significantly shortening it with the use of atomic weapons.
It was certainly a reasonable view for the USA to take, since they had suffered the loss of more than 418,000 lives, both military and civilian. To the top rank of the US military the 135,000 death toll was worth it to prevent the “many thousands of American troops [that] would be killed in invading Japan” – a view attributed to the president himself.
Explanation:
Answer:
Situational attribution.
Explanation:
Attribution is the cause of an event related to our behavior. Attribution is the concept related to making our world and experience make a sense. Attribution is a phenomenon that helps us to learn how a person is related to the things and relate to self from other things.
It is also predicted our future and behavior outcomes. For instance, if we hear that Mona is very reliable, then we attribute that she is reliable and we will share our secrets with her. In the above statement, Mary Alice makes an attribution related to the situation for that she believes that a complaint from the client towards her because they are less in number in staff.
