1) gradient of line = Δ y ÷ Δ x
= (5 -2) ÷ (3 - (-6))
= ¹/₃
using the point-slope form (y-y₁) = m(x-x₁)
using (3,5)
(y - 5) = ¹/₃ (x -3)
y - 5 = ¹/₃x - 1
⇒ <span> y = ¹/₃ x + 4 [OPTION D]
</span>2) y = 2x + 5 .... (1)
<span> </span>y = ¹/₂ x + 6 .... (2)
by substituting y in (1) for y in (2)
2x + 5 = ¹/₂ x + 6
³/₂ x = 1
x = ²/₃
by substituting found x (2)
y = ¹/₂ (²/₃) + 6
y = ¹⁹/₃
∴ common point is (²/₃ , ¹⁹/₃) thus answer is FALSE [OPTION B]
3) Yes [OPTION A]
This is because the both have a gradient of 5 and if they have the same gradient then that means that the two lines are parallel to each other.
4) No [OPTION B]
Two lines are perpendicular if their gradients multiply to give - 1 and as such one is the negative reciprocal of the other. Since both gradients are ¹/₂ then they are actually parallel and not perpendicular.
-2<x<3 | *2
-4<2x<6 | +7
3< 2x+7< 13
3<10<13
The answer is C
Answer:
so to get a third you divide it by 3
first convert it to fraction
so it is 26/3
so do 26/3 divided by 3
so we do keep switch flip
26/3*1/3
so answer is 26/9 or 2 8/9
Step-by-step explanation:
The x-axis.
In the form Y = mx + b
m is the slope, so no slope means that my is zero so that means x is zero also.
So you would end up with
y = b so that means y will always be that value and the only thing that will change is the x value. This will create a horizontal lines that is parallel to the x-axis
No, the trailer cannot hold the weight of the bricks. It is beyond the 900kg capacity of the trailer. The total weight of the bricks is 1,013.77 kilograms. The total weight was derived from getting the volume of the brick (0.051m x 0.102m x 0.203m), then multiplying the volume to the density of each brick (1.056 x 10^3m^3 x 1920kg/m^3). The weight of each brick is 2.03kg. Lastly, multiply the total number of bricks to the weight of each brick to get the total weight.
