No, the population of people is poorly represented with this low sample size. 150 would better represent the population as a whole. 42 people would want to play on Rolling Meadows. (according to the previous data)
Step-by-step explanation:
Most likely this small sample size is too small to gain sufficient data from the whole population. If he were to survey a larger sample of people, he would overall better represent the population as a whole. The percentage of people who would prefer Rolling Meadows in the first sample was 28% (7/25). So just multiply 150 times .28 and get 42. 42 people would want to play on Rolling Meadows.
